Abstract

Trust tends to be described through the lens of a rational choice of a trustor driven by the trustworthiness of a trustee. This, however, does not exhaust scenarios where people seem to be comfortable trusting without having an actual choice or not trusting while having a selection of potential trustees. This paper proposes that there should be another force at work that only expresses itself through the rationality in situations of choice. It is the self-preservation that strongly influences our decisions, specifically when choices seem to diminish. Ignoring this force makes the theory of trust incomplete. This paper brings this area of social behaviour closer to computational trust by proposing a unifying model that builds on theories of social systems. It focuses specifically on the containment of complexity and the associated risk to self-preservation, where trust is not an option but a necessity. The model, by being both simple and expressive, can computationally explain several phenomena associated with trusting in situations where self-preservation may be under a threat. This is further demonstrated by several use cases.

Highlights

  • Deutsch (1958) identified numerous ways that make a human trust another human, yet models used by computational trust focus entirely on only one

  • This paper formalises decision to trust on the basis of the theory of social systems to demonstrate that such formalisation extends into situations where trust defies choice

  • It shows that self-preservation can be the driving force of such behaviour

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Deutsch (1958) identified numerous ways that make a human trust another human, yet models used by computational trust focus entirely on only one. This leaves a large area of human trust without proper computational representation. This paper brings into the domain of computational trust those cases where trust seems to defy the rationality of a choice, where it departs from reciprocating trustworthiness. These are the cases where trust exists despite having no choice and where trust does not exist despite the existence of valid choices.

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.