Abstract
Authors of the present paper examined near hundred of Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE) systems. It is offered to consider CASE-systems evolution in the form of TRIZ-fractal matrix. Herewith the motivating force of evolution is resolution of contradictions which have appeared at the previous stages except that contradictions are resolved using TRIZ tools. Criteria which are connected with TRIZ concept “ideality” and according to which CASE-systems develop are practicality and investment. In the paper it is singled out CASE-systems development lines, their advantages and disadvantages and is analyzed purpose and development trend of each line. Usage of the present approach for training allows to reduce significantly time for learning different CASE-systems by means of knowledge systematization. On the other side this systematization will allow first to find out the priority of following development of CASE-systems, second to simplify significantly a choice of CASE-systems being used at enterprises and third to approve TRIZ tools application for contradictions resolution in CASE-systems.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
