Abstract

Isopach maps and backstripped tectonic subsidence plots from the Triassic–Jurassic of the St. George’s Channel basin reveal significant departures from current models of extensional basin development: (i) rifting was highly protracted with discrete increments of crustal extension spanning ca. 120 My, (ii) substantial syn-kinematic sediment on the footwalls of major faults records pure shear (sub-seismic scale) deformation to have been important during regional Triassic extension. Forward modelling of depth-converted seismic interpretations is used to test the notion of combined pure and simple shear and to quantify the distribution of crustal extension between large and sub-seismic scale faults. The models indicate that Triassic subsidence was generated by ca. 2.5 km extension on major faults and 10 km extension by sub-seismic scale faulting. In fault-bounded compartments, Jurassic extension was dominated by large-scale faults, whereas in the areas of overlap between major fault segments, Jurassic extension was taken up chiefly by sub-seismic scale faulting. Comparison of measured vitrinite reflectance (VR) and VR modelled from heatflow history yielded by the forward models supports this scheme of episodic, pure shear-dominated extension. This research highlights the inherent difficulty in using seismic interpretation in isolation from quantitative subsidence and/or thermal history data to identify syn- and post-kinematic sedimentary sequences. Furthermore, it provides an opportunity to more fully reconstruct Mesozoic basin development in the West-of-UK area which, in the Cheshire, Central and East Irish Sea basins, is largely precluded by erosion of post-Triassic strata.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call