Trials comparing flowable and conventional resin composite using the US public health service criteria show that there are probably no differences in the clinical outcomes between the materials

Romina Brignardello-Petersen

doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2018.03.007

Trials comparing flowable and conventional resin composite using the US public health service criteria show that there are probably no differences in the clinical outcomes between the materials

Romina Brignardello-Petersen

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2018.03.007

Copy DOI

Journal: The Journal of the American Dental Association

Publication Date: May 15, 2018

#US Public Health Service Criteria #Conventional Resin Composite + Show 8 more

Abstract
Full-Text PDF
Similar Papers

Abstract

Shaalan OO, Abou-Auf E, El Zoghby AF. Clinical evaluation of flowable resin composite versus conventional resin composite in carious and noncarious lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20(6):380-385. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_226_17.

Full Text