Abstract

While access to psychotherapy has recently increased in the US, concern exists that recent gains may be unevenly distributed despite teletherapy expansion. To characterize recent trends and patterns in outpatient psychotherapy by US adults. This is a repeated cross-sectional study of psychotherapy use among adults (ages ≥18 years) in the 2018 to 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys, which are nationally representative surveys of the civilian noninstitutionalized population. Data were analyzed from March to August 2024. Age-, sex-, and distress-adjusted differences between 2018 and 2021 in use of any psychotherapy and video-based psychotherapy (teletherapy) in 2021 with tests for trend differences (interactions) across levels of sociodemographic characteristics and distress were assessed. Psychological distress was measured using the Kessler-6 scale, with scores of 13 or higher defining serious psychological distress, 1 to 12 defining mild to moderate distress, and 0 defining no distress. The analysis involved 89 619 participants (47 838 female [51.5%] and 41 781 male [48.5%]; 22 510 aged 18-34 years [29.0%], 43 371 aged 35-64 years [48.8%], and 23 738 aged ≥65 years [22.2%]). Between 2018 and 2021, psychotherapy use increased significantly faster for females (931/12 270 females [7.7%] to 1207/12 237 females [10.5%]) than males (547/10 741 males [5.2%] to 655/10 544 males [6.3%]), younger (455/6149 individuals [8.0%] to 602/5296 individuals [11.9%] aged 18-34 years) than older (217/5550 individuals [3.6%] to 304/6708 individuals [4.6%] aged ≥65 years) adults, college graduates (503/6456 adults [7.6%] to 810/7277 adults [11.4%]) than those without a high school diploma (193/3824 adults [5.5%] to 200/3593 adults [7.0%]), privately insured (881/14 387 adults [6.1%] to 1154/13 414 adults [8.9%]) than publicly insured (558/6511 adults [8.8%] to 659/7453 adults [8.8%]) individuals, adults at 2 to 4 times the poverty level (370/6670 adults [5.7%] to 488/6370 adults [8.2%]) than those below the poverty level (384/4495 adults [9.7%] to 428/4760 adults [10.0%]), employed persons overall (733/13 358 adults [5.7%] to 1082/12 365 adults [8.9%]) than unemployed persons aged 65 years and younger (547/5138 adults [10.8%] to 519/4905 adults [10.5%]), and urban (1335/20 682 adults [6.5%] to 1729/20 590 adults [8.7%]) than rural (143/2329 adults [6.4%] to 133/2191 adults [5.9%]) residents. In 2021, after controlling for distress level, teletherapy use was significantly higher among younger than middle-aged (aged 35-64 years: difference, -3.7 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.1 to -2.3) or older (aged ≥65 years: difference, -6.5 percentage points (95% CI, -8.0 to -5.0 percentage points) adults, females (difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.9 to 2.9 percentage points) than males, not married (difference, 2.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.6 to 4.2 percentage points) than married persons, college educated adults (difference, 4.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.3 to 6.4 percentage points) than those without a high school diploma, people with higher (eg, 400% vs <100% of the federal poverty level: difference, 2.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.5 percentage points) than lower incomes, privately than publicly (difference, -2.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.4 to -1.5 percentage points) insured persons, and urban (difference, 2.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.5 to 3.8 percentage points) than rural residents. This study found that psychotherapy use increased significantly faster among several socioeconomically advantaged groups and that inequalities were evident in teletherapy access. These trends and patterns highlight a need for clinical interventions and health care policies to broaden access to psychotherapy including teletherapy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.