Abstract
Globally, many biomes are being impacted by significant shifts in total annual rainfall as well as increasing variability of rainfall within and among years. Such changes can have potentially large impacts on plant productivity and growth, but remain largely unknown, particularly for much of the Southern Hemisphere. We investigate how growth of the widespread conifer, Callitris columellaris varied with inter-annual variation in the amount, intensity and frequency of rainfall events over the last century and between semi-arid (<500 mm mean annual rainfall) and tropical (>800 mm mean annual rainfall) biomes in Australia. We used linear and polynomial regression models to investigate the strength and shape of the relationships between growth (ring width) and rainfall. At semi-arid sites, growth was strongly and linearly related to rainfall amount, regardless of differences in the seasonality and intensity of rainfall. The linear shape of the relationship indicates that predicted future declines in mean rainfall will have proportional negative impacts on long-term tree growth in semi-arid biomes. In contrast, growth in the tropics showed a weak and asymmetrical (‘concave-down’) response to rainfall amount, where growth was less responsive to changes in rainfall amount at the higher end of the rainfall range (>1250 mm annual rainfall) than at the lower end (<1000 mm annual rainfall). The asymmetric relationship indicates that long-term growth rates of Callitris in the tropics are more sensitive to increased inter-annual variability of rainfall than to changes in the mean amount of rainfall. Our findings are consistent with observations that the responses of vegetation to changes in the mean or variability of rainfall differ between mesic and semi-arid biomes. These results highlight how contrasting growth responses of a widespread species across a hydroclimatic gradient can inform understanding of potential sensitivity of different biomes to climatic variability and change.
Highlights
Spatial patterns of average primary productivity and carbon fluxes among biomes can be strongly predicted by spatial variation in mean annual rainfall [1,2,3,4]
We found that the sensitivity of growth to changes in rainfall amount differs substantially between semi-arid and tropical biomes of Australia and is the highest in semi-arid biomes
We found that the shape of the temporal relationship between growth and rainfall amount differs between semi-arid and tropical biomes of Australia (Fig 3), which has important implications for estimating how growth rates are likely to respond to potential changes in rainfall amount or variability
Summary
Spatial patterns of average primary productivity and carbon fluxes among biomes can be strongly predicted by spatial variation in mean annual rainfall [1,2,3,4]. Understanding how temporal patterns of rainfall influence plant productivity and growth is crucial for modelling and predicting vegetation responses under present or future climate conditions. The sensitivity of plant productivity to changes in the mean or variability of rainfall depends on the slope and shape (linear or non-linear) of the relationship between them [5,6,7, 13, 14]. Non-linear (‘concave-up’ or ‘concave-down’) relationships between productivity and rainfall indicate that extremes of annual or seasonal rainfall, either positive or negative, can potentially drive disproportionately large (asymmetrical) responses in plant productivity [6, 7, 13]. If the relationship is of a concave down form, dry extremes will drive larger decreases in productivity relative to increases in productivity driven by wet extremes (‘negative asymmetry’), and increases in rainfall variability are expected to drive both increased variability in productivity and an overall decrease in mean productivity [6, 16, 17]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
