Abstract

IntroductionLess than one-third of bladder cancers are non-pure urothelial carcinoma [with variant histological (VH) or non-urothelial carcinoma (non-UC)] for which no treatment guidelines are available. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of systemic treatments in VH or non-UC bladder cancers.MaterialsMulticenter retrospective analysis of patients treated for advanced or metastatic VH or non-UC bladder cancers. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to treatment line, regimen and histology subtype. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsBetween 2005 and 2020, 46 patients from seven centers were included. The median age was 66 years (58.75; 74.75), 65.2% were male and 67.2% presented VH. At first line, the ORR for the entire population was 54.4% and median OS was 21.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.2-38.6). The ORR of the 37 patients treated with chemotherapy at first line was 62.2% with median PFS and OS of 7.3 (95% CI: 4.5-8.6) and 21.6 months (95% CI: 14.2-35.7), respectively. Dose dense MVAC and platinum doublet chemotherapy had the highest ORR (71.4% and 65.2%). The 9 patients treated with immunotherapy at first line had an ORR of 22.2%, a median PFS of 3.3 months (95% CI:2.3-NR) and the median OS was not reached (95% CI:13.8-NR). Response to treatment varied depending on the histological sub-types and on the treatment type.ConclusionChemotherapy and immunotherapy have shown to be effective in VH or non-UC cancers, a rare histological subtype for which we currently have very little data in the literature.

Highlights

  • Less than one-third of bladder cancers are non-pure urothelial carcinoma [with variant histological (VH) or non-urothelial carcinoma] for which no treatment guidelines are available

  • Our study evaluated the efficacy of first, second- and third-line therapies in VH and non-urothelial carcinoma (non-urothelial carcinoma (UC)) bladder cancer

  • If we compare our results with previously published studies on VH or non-UC bladder cancer, we note that chemotherapy produces tumor responses in the majority of cases, but with variations depending on the histological subtype

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Less than one-third of bladder cancers are non-pure urothelial carcinoma [with variant histological (VH) or non-urothelial carcinoma (non-UC)] for which no treatment guidelines are available. Pure non-urothelial carcinomas (non-UC) represent 10% of bladder cancers in western countries, including squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors [8, 9]. Because of their rarity, patients with non-UC or predominant VH are frequently excluded from prospective clinical trials evaluating new drugs. Very few data are available for metastatic disease; the literature includes only small retrospective series or case reports [2, 14,15,16,17] Due to this lack of data, the management of VH and non-UC is currently extrapolated from UC care [18, 19]. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of systemic treatments in VH or non-UC bladder cancer

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call