Treatment of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension with cafedrine/theodrenaline versus ephedrine during caesarean section: Results from HYPOTENS, a national, multicentre, prospective, noninterventional study.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDIn Germany, hypotension induced by spinal anaesthesia is commonly treated with a combination of cafedrine hydrochloride (C, 200 mg) and theodrenaline hydrochloride (T, 10 mg) in 2 ml. We compared the effectiveness of C/T with ephedrine.OBJECTIVESThe primary objectives were to assess the speed of onset and the ability to restore blood pressure without an increase in heart rate. Secondary objectives were to evaluate maternal/foetal outcomes and the number of required additional boluses or other additional measures.DESIGNHYPOTENS was a national, multicentre, prospective, open-label, two-armed, noninterventional study comparing C/T with ephedrine in two prospectively defined cohorts. This study relates to the cohort of patients receiving spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.SETTINGGerman hospitals using either C/T or ephedrine in their routine clinical practice.PATIENTSWomen aged at least 18 years receiving spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.INTERVENTIONSBolus administration of C/T or ephedrine at the discretion of the attending anaesthesiologist.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESEndpoints within 15 min after initial administration of C/T or ephedrine were area under the curve between the observed SBP and the minimum target SBP; and incidence of newly occurring heart rate of at least 100 beats min−1.RESULTSAlthough effective blood pressure stabilisation was achieved with both treatments, this effect was faster and more pronounced with C/T (P < 0.0001). The incidence of tachycardia and changes in heart rate were higher with ephedrine (P < 0.01). Fewer additional boluses (P < 0.01) were required with C/T. Although favourable neonatal outcomes were reported in both groups, base deficit and lactate values were greater with ephedrine (P < 0.01). Physician satisfaction was higher with C/T.CONCLUSIONSAfter C/T, tachycardia was not a problem, providing an advantage over ephedrine. Fewer additional boluses were required with C/T, suggesting greater effectiveness. An increased base deficit with ephedrine suggests reduced oxygen supply or increased demands in foetal circulation.TRIALS REGISTRATIONClinicaltrials.gov: NCT02893241, German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00010740.