Transthoracic Doppler assessment of pattern of left ventricular dysfunction in hypertensive heart disease: combined analysis of mitral and pulmonary venous flow velocity patterns.

Abstract

Although mitral flow velocity pattern changes with the progression of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction, it lacks predictive value in individual patients because of pseudonormalization in the presence of congestive heart failure and many physiologic and pathologic contributors to the mitral flow velocity pattern. To determine whether analysis of pulmonary venous flow velocity patterns complements the information obtainable from the mitral flow velocity patterns in the evaluation of patterns of LV dysfunction of hypertensive heart disease in individual patients, the ratio of the peak early diastolic filling velocity/peak filling velocity at atrial contraction (E/A ratio) in the mitral flow velocity pattern and the ratio of the peak systolic forward flow velocity (S)/peak diastolic forward flow velocity (D) (S/D ratio) in the pulmonary venous flow velocity pattern by the transthoracic approach were determined in 107 hypertensive patients with and without congestive heart failure. Age-related normal values of the E/A and S/D ratios were determined in 61 normal subjects and used to judge the normality or abnormality of the patterns. Results of the study indicate that (1) although an increased mitral E/A ratio is strongly indicative of heart failure with normal LV systolic function, the mitral E/A ratio is frequently within the normal range in hypertensive patients with heart failure; (2) association of decreased pulmonary venous S/D ratios with a normal mitral flow velocity pattern indicates the presence of heart failure as a result of LV systolic dysfunction that is usually observed at the most advanced pattern of LV dysfunction; (3) mild LV diastolic dysfunction is likely to exist in patients with normal E/A ratios if the pulmonary venous S/D ratio is higher than normal value; (4) predictive accuracy in the detection of LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction would be improved if both mitral and pulmonary venous flow velocity patterns rather than the mitral flow velocity pattern alone were analyzed. In conclusion, analysis of pulmonary venous flow velocity recordings improves accuracy and reliability of the Doppler assessment of LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction, particularly in individual hypertensive patients with normal mitral flow velocity patterns.