Transport Inputs and Residential Rent Theory: An Empirical Analysis*

Abstract

Geographical AnalysisVolume 2, Issue 1 p. 43-54 Free Access Transport Inputs and Residential Rent Theory: An Empirical Analysis* James O. Wheeler, James O. Wheeler James Wheeler is associate professor of geography and the computer institute for social science research, Michigan State University.Search for more papers by this author James O. Wheeler, James O. Wheeler James Wheeler is associate professor of geography and the computer institute for social science research, Michigan State University.Search for more papers by this author First published: January 1970 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1970.tb00143.xCitations: 6 * The author gratefully acknowledges support for this study from an All University Research Grant, Michigan State University. Computer analysis was carried out in the Computers Centers at Western Michigan University and Michigan State University. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat LITERATURE CITED 1 Alonso, W. Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964. 2 Alonso, W. A Theory of the Urban Land Market,” in Readings in Economic Geography: The Location of Economic Activity, ed. H. T. Smith, E. J. Taaffe, and L. J. King. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company, 1968. 3 Berry, B. J. L., W. Simmons, and R. J. Tennant. Urban Population Densities: Structure and Change,” Geographical Review, 53 (1963), 389– 405. 4 Brodsky, H. Location Rent and Journey-to-Work Patterns in Seattle.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, 1966. 5 Evans, H. K. A Vast New Storehouse of Transportation and Marketing Data,” Journal of Marketing, 30 (1966), 33– 40. 6 Garrison, W. L. Urban Transportation Studies,” in Papers on Regional Statistical Studies, ed. S. Ostry and T. K. Rymes. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1966. Pp. 1– 13. 7 Kain, J. F. The Journey to Work as a Determinant of Residential Locations,” Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 9 (1962), 137– 60. 8 King, L. J. Approaches to Locational Analysis: An Overview,” The East Lakes Geographer, 2 (1966). 9 Morrill, R. L. The Movement of Persons and the Transportation Problem,” Quantitative Geography: Economic and Cultural Topics, ed. W. L. Garrison and D. F. Marble. Evanston: Department of Geography, Northwestern University, 1967. Pp. 84– 93. 10 Nourse, H. O. Regional Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968. Pp. 93– 125. 11 Stevens, B. H. Linear Programming and Location Rent,” Journal of Regional Science, 3 (1961), 15– 26. 12 von Böventer, E. The Relationship Between Transportation Costs and Location Rent in Transportation Problems,” Journal of Regional Science, 3 (1961), 27– 40. 13 Wheeler, J. O. Occupational Status and Work-Trips: A Minimum Distance Approach,” Social Forces, 45 (1966), 508– 15. 14 Wheeler, J. O. Some Effects of Occupational Status on Work-Trips,” Journal of Regional Science, 9 (1969), pp. 69– 77. 15 Wingo, L. Jr. Transportation and Urban Land. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 1961. 16 Zettel, R. M. and R. R. Carll. Summary Review of Major Metropolitan Area Transportation Studies in the United States. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Transportation and Traffic Engineers, 1962. Citing Literature Volume2, Issue1January 1970Pages 43-54 ReferencesRelatedInformation