Abstract

BackgroundSphingomonas wittichii strain RW1 can completely oxidize dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, which are persistent contaminants of soils and sediments. For successful application in soil bioremediation systems, strain RW1 must cope with fluctuations in water availability, or water potential. Thus far, however, little is known about the adaptive strategies used by Sphingomonas bacteria to respond to changes in water potential. To improve our understanding, strain RW1 was perturbed with either the cell-permeating solute sodium chloride or the non-permeating solute polyethylene glycol with a molecular weight of 8000 (PEG8000). These solutes are assumed to simulate the solute and matric components of the total water potential, respectively. The responses to these perturbations were then assessed and compared using a combination of growth assays, transcriptome profiling, and membrane fatty acid analyses.ResultsUnder conditions producing a similar decrease in water potential but without effect on growth rate, there was only a limited shared response to perturbation with sodium chloride or PEG8000. This shared response included the increased expression of genes involved with trehalose and exopolysaccharide biosynthesis and the reduced expression of genes involved with flagella biosynthesis. Mostly, the responses to perturbation with sodium chloride or PEG8000 were very different. Only sodium chloride triggered the increased expression of two ECF-type RNA polymerase sigma factors and the differential expression of many genes involved with outer membrane and amino acid metabolism. In contrast, only PEG8000 triggered the increased expression of a heat shock-type RNA polymerase sigma factor along with many genes involved with protein turnover and repair. Membrane fatty acid analyses further corroborated these differences. The degree of saturation of membrane fatty acids increased after perturbation with sodium chloride but had the opposite effect and decreased after perturbation with PEG8000.ConclusionsA combination of growth assays, transcriptome profiling, and membrane fatty acid analyses revealed that permeating and non-permeating solutes trigger different adaptive responses in strain RW1, suggesting these solutes affect cells in fundamentally different ways. Future work is now needed that connects these responses with the responses observed in more realistic scenarios of soil desiccation.

Highlights

  • Sphingomonas wittichii strain RW1 can completely oxidize dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, which are persistent contaminants of soils and sediments

  • A previous study with Sphingomonas wittichii strain RW1 demonstrated that these enzyme systems are functional when the strain is inoculated into contaminated soils [6], which is promising for bioremediation applications

  • Effect of sodium chloride and PEG8000 on the specific growth rate To investigate the effect of the water potential on the specific growth rate of strain RW1, DSM457-Sal medium was amended with sodium chloride or PEG8000 to reduce the water potential of standard DSM457-Sal medium by 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, or 2.5 MPa

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sphingomonas wittichii strain RW1 can completely oxidize dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, which are persistent contaminants of soils and sediments. Strain RW1 was perturbed with either the cell-permeating solute sodium chloride or the non-permeating solute polyethylene glycol with a molecular weight of 8000 (PEG8000) These solutes are assumed to simulate the solute and matric components of the total water potential, respectively. One strategy to mitigate such contamination is to apply bioremediation processes that exploit DD- and DF-degrading members of the Sphingomonas group of bacteria [1]. These bacteria use dioxygenase enzyme systems to completely oxidize DD and DF and to co-oxidize many of their chlorinated congeners [2,3,4,5]. The soil environment poses significant challenges to the sustained activity and viability of this strain, which could hinder its successful long-term application in bioremediation processes

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call