Abstract
Industrial firms dependent on their developed engineering knowledge base lament the loss of years of accumulated capability as Baby Boom generation engineers fade into retirement. Looking for ways to retain this institutional learning, the notion of knowledge transfer between engineers of differing generations offers an opportunity to maintain competitive positioning and innovation momentum. Understanding how communication behaviours and preferences differ among the engineering disciplines and generations may be a key toward supporting corporate knowledge transfer. This exploratory study compares communication norms across disciplines of nearly 400 practicing engineers in America, seeking to identify similarities and differences. The study examines responses to a communications focused survey instrument using analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical methods, offering a glimpse into engineering communication preferences and behaviours. Findings reveal that statistical differences relating to communication do not exist between the ten examined engineering disciplines, however, further inquiry and instrument development is suggested.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
