Trans-arterial embolization versus chemoembolization for neuroendocrine liver metastases: a propensity matched analysis

Abstract

IntroductionLocoregional therapies are a mainstay of treatment for patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM), yet the optimal transarterial approach remains undefined and recent studies have raised concern over the safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). MethodsPatients with NELM who underwent TACE or transarterial embolization (TAE) at a single institution between 2000–2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) controlling for age, sex, bilateral disease, tumor size, lobar embolization, grade, and extrahepatic disease was utilized to compare short- and long-term outcomes. ResultsAmong 412 patients with NELM, 329 underwent TACE and 83 TAE. Mean age was 60.7 ± 11.1 years. Patients primarily presented with synchronous (69.2%), bilateral (84.2%), and G1 disease (48.8%) and underwent staged procedures (55.8%). Following PSM, TACE was associated with slightly worse post-procedure laboratory values, but no difference in complications compared to TAE (23.3%vs29.3%, p = 0.247). TACE was associated with improved mean PFS (21.8vs10.7 months, p = 0.002), but no difference in radiographic size, chromogranin level, or median overall survival (50.0 months vs not met, p = 0.833). ConclusionAmong patients with NELM, TACE was associated with similar short-term outcomes and improved PFS, but no difference in OS compared to TAE. These findings highlight the need for additional research on the optimal locoregional therapy for NELM.