Abstract

Lunar missions are currently experiencing a significant surge in popularity, presenting expansive opportunities for further exploration and development. To thoroughly explore the design margins and potential of lunar landers, and to foster the development of overall designs driven by comprehensive performance objectives, it is crucial to conduct optimization design considering the coupling between key disciplines such as trajectory and propulsion. Considering the significant increase in computational complexity caused by conducting trajectory/propulsion integrated design optimization, the analytical target cascading method is employed to hierarchically decompose and coordinate optimization of the complex systems. This article presents a phased soft-landing strategy on the manned lunar lander propelled by hybrid rocket motors, utilizing powered explicit guidance and Apollo powered descent guidance, and proceeds with the trajectory/propulsion integrated design optimization involving diverse grain shapes and feed systems. This optimization process is separately undertaken utilizing multidisciplinary feasible method and analytical target cascading method. The analysis reveals that integrating trajectory and propulsion considerations into the optimization process facilitates a 5 % reduction in the overall mass relative to optimizations constrained solely by velocity increment and lack comprehensive trajectory design considerations. This highlights the profound impact of trajectory requirements on propulsion system design and the advantages of powered explicit guidance laws in minimizing fuel consumption. Crucially, the use of analytical target cascading achieves the better optimization results, and significantly reduces subsystem evaluation times, enhancing operational efficiency by 48 %, demonstrating the advantage in handling complex, large-scale systems. On another level, with different β values, the Mean Relative Error of the target values for the three schemes obtained by the analytical target cascading method is 0.0016, indicating good stability and strong robustness. The practical exploration in this article provides methods and frameworks for high-performance optimization design of complex aerospace mission profiles in the future.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.