Abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding heterogeneity seen in patients with COVIDARDS and comparing to non-COVIDARDS may inform tailored treatments.MethodsA multidisciplinary team of frontline clinicians and data scientists worked to create the Northwell COVIDARDS dataset (NorthCARDS) leveraging over 11,542 COVID-19 hospital admissions. The data was then summarized to examine descriptive differences based on clinically meaningful categories of lung compliance, and to examine trends in oxygenation.FindingsOf the 1536 COVIDARDS patients in the NorthCARDS dataset, there were 531 (34.6%) who had very low lung compliance (< 20 ml/cmH2O), 970 (63.2%) with low-normal compliance (20–50 ml/cmH2O), and 35 (2.2%) with high lung compliance (> 50 ml/cmH2O). The very low compliance group had double the median time to intubation compared to the low-normal group (107.3 h (IQR 25.8, 239.2) vs. 39.5 h (IQR 5.4, 91.6)). Overall, 68.8% (n = 1057) of the patients died during hospitalization. In comparison to non-COVIDARDS reports, there were less patients in the high compliance category (2.2% vs. 12%, compliance ≥ 50 mL/cmH20), and more patients with P/F ≤ 150 (59.8% vs. 45.6%). There is a statistically significant correlation between compliance and P/F ratio. The Oxygenation Index is the highest in the very low compliance group (12.51, SD(6.15)), and lowest in high compliance group (8.78, SD(4.93)).ConclusionsThe respiratory system compliance distribution of COVIDARDS is similar to non-COVIDARDS. In some patients, there may be a relation between time to intubation and duration of high levels of supplemental oxygen treatment on trajectory of lung compliance.

Highlights

  • A subset of patients with COVID-19 deteriorate despite supportive measures, requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [1]

  • The respiratory system compliance distribution of COVIDARDS is similar to non-COVIDARDS

  • There may be a relation between time to intubation and duration of high levels of supplemental oxygen treatment on trajectory of lung compliance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A subset of patients with COVID-19 deteriorate despite supportive measures, requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [1]. Jafari et al BMC Pulmonary Medicine (2022) 22:51 who were mechanically ventilated at one of the 12 acute care hospitals within the Northwell Health System. We describe differences in demographics and treatments as well as trajectories of lung compliance and hypoxemia over the hospital course for patients with very low versus low-normal lung compliance. This work sets the stage for further data analytics among patients with COVIDARDS to better characterize phenogroups using readily available data elements from electronic health records. Understanding heterogeneity seen in patients with COVIDARDS and comparing to non-COVIDARDS may inform tailored treatments

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call