Abstract

PurposeEvaluate team and player compliance with the Knee Control injury prevention exercise programme, study the association between player compliance and injury rates, and compare coach demographics, baseline prevention expectancies, and programme utilisation between teams with high and low compliance.MethodsProspective one-season cohort study based on a cluster randomised controlled trial on 301 (107 female) floorball players aged 12–17 years. Floorball exposure and injuries were self-reported weekly by players using the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center questionnaire. Team and player compliance to Knee Control was reported monthly by coaches. Additionally, coaches answered pre- and post-season surveys. Teams were divided into a high (≥ 80%) or low (< 80%) compliance group based on their use of Knee Control during the season. Players were divided into three compliance groups based on their average weekly number of Knee Control sessions; high (≥ 2 sessions), intermediate (≥ 1 to < 2 sessions), and low dose (< 1 session).ResultsMean team compliance for the high and low compliance groups were 95% (range 82–100) and 50% (range 13–66), respectively. Mean ± SD weekly Knee Control dose in the three player compliance groups were 2.4 ± 0.3, 1.4 ± 0.3, and 0.7 ± 0.3 sessions, respectively. There were no differences in total injury incidence between the player compliance groups, but players in the high-dose group had a 35% lower prevalence of injuries overall [adjusted prevalence rate ratio (PRR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.48–0.89] and 60% lower prevalence of substantial injuries (adjusted PRR 0.40, 95% CI 0.26–0.61) compared with the low-dose group. Male players in the high-dose group had consistently lower injury incidence and prevalence, while no between compliance group differences were seen in female players. There were no differences in sex, years of coaching experience, or baseline prevention expectancies in general between coaches for teams in the high vs. low compliance groups, but teams in the high compliance group had a better utilisation fidelity.ConclusionThere was a clear dose–response relationship between more frequent Knee Control use and lower injury rates in male floorball players, but not in female players. Teams with higher compliance also showed a better utilisation fidelity with the programme.Level of evidenceLevel II.

Highlights

  • A high number of injuries are reported in many popular youth ball sports [1, 2], despite that several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown substantial injury rate reductions from various injury prevention exercise programmes (IPEPs) [3,4,5]

  • In another study, female youth football players in the highest compliance tertile had 88% lower rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury compared to players in the lowest compliance tertile [6]

  • The most important findings of the present study were that a higher Knee Control weekly dose was associated with lower injury incidence of time-loss and any floorball injuries and injury prevalence of substantial, gradual onset and any floorball injuries for male youth floorball players, while no such association was seen in female

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A high number of injuries are reported in many popular youth ball sports [1, 2], despite that several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown substantial injury rate reductions from various injury prevention exercise programmes (IPEPs) [3,4,5].The effectiveness of an IPEP depends on both team and player compliance to the programme [6,7,8]. In a team sport setting, team compliance includes timing and frequency of intervention execution, and depends largely on the motivation and actions of the coach [7]. Female youth football players with higher IPEP compliance (mean 1.5 sessions per week) had a 35% lower rate of all injuries compared to players with intermediate compliance (mean 0.7 sessions per week) [7]. In another study, female youth football players in the highest compliance tertile (mean 1.4 sessions per week) had 88% lower rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury compared to players in the lowest compliance tertile (mean 0.6 sessions per week) [6]. In addition to compliance, having high exercise fidelity (i.e., performing exercises with correct technique) and utilisation fidelity (i.e., which components of an IPEP that are used, when exercises are performed, and the number of sets and repetitions) [13], are important in achieving a successful implementation of an IPEP [14, 15]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call