Abstract

Billions of dollars are lost by low application of ineffective training. Fast declination of training memory may contribute this loss. The present study uses theoretical examinations via a conceptual model to examine the relationship between training memory and transfer behaviour. Training design, training retention (training memory), and training transfer are the study variables. The study population, is the federal ministries in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), was assessed via random sampling. Data were collected by a cross-sectional approach via questionnaires. Back-translation (English to Arabic), a pre-test, and a pilot test were applied to ensure that any modifications of the questionnaire items were precise and effective. The study was analysed via PLS-SEM. Based on the results, all of the study’s hypotheses were accepted, and significant relationships were revealed between the study variables. Training design is highly correlated with training retention, i.e., a premium training design will lead to a high preservation of the knowledge and skills gained from the training programme. Due to the low correlation between training retention and training transfer, the training retention was considered a secondary contributor of applying training to the work environment. If mangers and practitioners tend to achieve successful training transfer, their efforts should concentrate on adopting modern training design techniques, which could sufficiently maintain the training memory and increase training transfer.

Highlights

  • Training transfer, or applying training on the job, is a global concern in human resources management (Baldwin & Ford, 1988)

  • Baldwin and Ford (1988) and Holton, Bates, and Ruona (2000) established the most common models of training transfer in the pursuit of a holistic understanding of the transfer process. This study considered those efforts valuable contributions toward theorizing training transfer and the present study aims to examine a new conceptual model consisting of three variables (training design, training retention, and training transfer; dependent variables) with detailed justifications of the relationship between training design and training retention

  • Billions of dollars are lost by low application of training

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Applying training on the job, is a global concern in human resources management (Baldwin & Ford, 1988). Baldwin and Ford (1988) and Holton, Bates, and Ruona (2000) established the most common models of training transfer in the pursuit of a holistic understanding of the transfer process. This study considered those efforts valuable contributions toward theorizing training transfer and the present study aims to examine a new conceptual model consisting of three variables (training design, training retention (mediator), and training transfer; dependent variables) with detailed justifications of the relationship between training design and training retention (training memory). Several hypotheses are suggested for the study’s conceptual model

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.