Traditional face-bow transfer versus three-dimensional virtual reconstruction in orthognathic surgery

Abstract

Face-bow transfer is an essential step in articulator-based orthognathic surgery planning. However, it can be a source of inaccuracy. Virtual computer-based planning avoids this error through the use of direct patient-related three-dimensional imaging data. The aim of this prospective observational study was to determine the error of face-bow transfer three-dimensionally and correlate it to the different types of malocclusion. Orthognathic surgery performed on 38 patients (10 male, 28 female; mean (standard deviation) age 24.7 (6.9) years) was planned twice: first articulator-based with plaster models and second computer-based with surgery planning software. Both models were digitized and compared regarding the angle between the Frankfort horizontal plane and the occlusal plane. In most cases, the angle in the sagittal dimension was higher in the articulator-based model than in the computer-based model. The angle in the transverse dimension was as often under- as over-represented. The type of malocclusion, i.e. skeletal class, vertical relationship, and degree of asymmetry, had no significant impact on the amount of error. In conclusion, this study indicates that computer-based planning should be considered as an advantageous alternative in orthognathic surgery planning.