Abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding how stability and/or maneuverability affects motor control strategies can provide insight on moving about safely in an unpredictable world. Stability in human movement has been well-studied while maneuverability has not. Further, a tradeoff between stability and maneuverability during movement seems apparent, yet has not been quantified. We proposed that greater maneuverability, the ability to rapidly and purposefully change movement direction and speed, is beneficial in uncertain environments. We also hypothesized that gaining maneuverability comes at the expense of stability and perhaps also corresponds with decreased muscle coactivation.Materials and MethodsWe used a goal-directed forward lean movement task that integrated both stability and maneuverability. Subjects (n = 11) used their center of pressure to control a cursor on a computer monitor to reach a target. We added task uncertainty by shifting the target anterior-posterior position mid-movement. We used a balance board with a narrow beam that reduced the base of support in the medio-lateral direction and defined stability as the probability that subjects could keep the balance board level during the task.ResultsDuring the uncertainty condition, subjects were able to change direction of their anterior-posterior center of pressure more rapidly, indicating that subjects were more maneuverable. Furthermore, medio-lateral center of pressure excursions also approached the edges of the beam and reduced stability margins, implying that subjects were less stable (i.e. less able to keep the board level). On the narrow beam board, subjects increased muscle coactivation of lateral muscle pairs and had greater muscle activity in the left leg. However, there were no statistically significant differences in muscle activity amplitudes or coactivation with uncertainty.Conclusions/SignificanceThese results demonstrate that there is a tradeoff between stability and maneuverability during a goal-directed whole-body movement. Tasks with added uncertainty could help individuals learn to be more maneuverable yet sufficiently stable.

Highlights

  • A stability-maneuverability tradeoff during locomotion [1] and posture [2,3] seems apparent yet there are no experimental studies that quantify this tradeoff in humans

  • Medio-lateral center of pressure excursions approached the edges of the beam and reduced stability margins, implying that subjects were less stable

  • Conclusions/Significance: These results demonstrate that there is a tradeoff between stability and maneuverability during a goal-directed whole-body movement

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A stability-maneuverability tradeoff during locomotion [1] and posture [2,3] seems apparent yet there are no experimental studies that quantify this tradeoff in humans. There are numerous studies that examine stability in human movement [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. The definition of maneuverability is less debatable, and generally relates to turning ability, which involves purposeful changes in movement direction and/or speed. Fewer studies have examined maneuverability in human movement [1,2]. Stability in human movement has been well-studied while maneuverability has not. A tradeoff between stability and maneuverability during movement seems apparent, yet has not been quantified. We hypothesized that gaining maneuverability comes at the expense of stability and perhaps corresponds with decreased muscle coactivation

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call