Abstract

The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) represent five narratives of future development used for climate change research. They include quantified projections of socioeconomic variables such as population, income levels, inequalities, and emissions over the twenty-first century. The SSP’s population projections embody explicit, pathway-specific international migration assumptions, which are only implicit in the projections of other variables. In this contribution, we explicitly quantify the effects of international migration on income levels and income inequality across and within countries by comparing the original SSP projections to scenarios of zero migration. Income projections without migration are obtained by removing two effects of migration on income dynamics: changes in population size and remittances sent to origin countries. We base our remittance estimates on migrant stocks derived from bilateral migration flow estimates obtained from a gravity model. We find that, on average, migration tends to make the world richer in all SSP narratives. The nature of migration and remittance corridors is shaped by the specific scenario of future development considered. Depending on the particular SSP narrative and world region considered, the effects of migration on income can be substantial, ranging from −5 to +21% at the continental level. We show that migration tends to decrease income inequality across countries and within country in most destination countries but does not affect within-country inequality in origin countries. This new set of projections is consistent with the interdisciplinary framework of the SSPs, which makes it particularly useful for assessing global climate and sustainable development policy options.

Highlights

  • Migration decisions are often multi-causal and environmental stress is merely one of many underlying drivers of migration

  • We show that migration tends to make the world richer, on average, in all Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) scenarios

  • We use the estimates from the gravity model given by Eq (3) to generate projections of bilateral migration flows between countries, which we rescale to SSP totals for the period 2015–2100 and for each one of the five SSP scenarios

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Migration decisions are often multi-causal and environmental stress is merely one of many underlying drivers of migration. Environmental change is likely to influence migration through various economic, political, social, demographic, and environmental channels (Black et al 2011a, b). Both extreme weather events, whose intensity is expected to increase in the future, and slow-onset events (e.g., droughts, sea-level rise (Desmet et al 2021) influence migration patterns. These environmental changes might enhance migration when used as an adaptation strategy or suppress migration when subgroups of vulnerable population cannot afford outmigration in the future (Borderon et al 2019, Cattaneo and Peri 2016; Hoffmann et al 2020). Changes in migration patterns, including those driven by climate change, have substantial implications for future socioeconomic development

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call