Trace elements and Li isotopes distinguish between liquid and solid phases contributing to mafic arc magmas

Abstract

It is generally accepted that metasomatism of the mantle wedge peridotite by subducting slab-derived fluids plays a key role in dictating the composition of mafic arc magmas. However, this fluid metasomatism model has been challenged recently by the mélange diapirism model. In order to distinguish between liquid and solid phases that would exclusively contribute to mafic arc magmas, we have carried out an integrated study of whole-rock and mineral geochemistry for two types of contemporaneous mafic igneous rocks (gabbroic diorites and diorite dikes) from an accretionary orogen. The results indicate primary contributions from liquid phases composed of not only slab-derived aqueous solution but also seafloor sediment-derived hydrous melt. Although these mafic rocks all exhibit typical arc-like trace element distribution patterns, they show a series of differences in stable Li and radiogenic Sr–Nd–Hf isotope compositions as well as other geochemical variables. In general, the gabbroic diorites are characterized by enrichment in fluid-mobile elements (e.g., Rb, Ba, K, Pb, and Sr), high δ7Li and δ18O values, and depletion in Sr–Nd–Hf isotope compositions. By contrast, the diorite dikes exhibit enrichment in melt-mobile elements (e.g., LILE, LREE and Th), relatively low δ7Li values, and slight enrichment in Sr–Nd–Hf isotope compositions. There are also systematic differences and pertinent variations between Li isotope compositions and slab-derived fluid indicators such as whole-rock Rb/Nd, Sr/Nd, Nb/U, Th/La, Th/Nd and Th/Yb ratios for the two types of mafic igneous rocks. These indicate that the mantle sources of these mafic rocks would possess geochemical signatures that were acquired through chemical metasomatism by slab-derived fluids rather than physical mixing with mélange diapirs. Furthermore, the geochemical signatures allow for distinction between the oceanic slab-derived aqueous solution and the seafloor sediment-derived hydrous melt. This qualitative interpretation is quantitatively confirmed by model calculations of trace elements and Sr–Nd–Li isotopes in the two types of mafic igneous rocks. Therefore, the target mafic igneous rocks provide the geochemical evidence for the formation of their mantle sources through chemical metasomatism by incorporating the two types of metasomatic agent into the mantle wedge. This demonstrates a strong preference for the fluid metasomatism model over the mélange diapirism model for the origin of mafic arc magmas.