Abstract
The project of creating a sociological approach integrating a subjectivist and an objectivist mode of knowledge is the explicit metatheory on which Bourdieu's sociology rests. This paper is a contribution to the debate on how successful Bourdieu has proved to be in carrying out his metatheoretical project and transcending the antinomy between subjectivism and objectivism in his social theory. In the first place, it examines the weakest points in the theoretical logic of his social theory. In particular, the paper sets out to demonstrate that Bourdieu's theoretical system considered synchronically contains multiple positions on agency, symbolism and the problem of social order, and that in each case the difference among the positions can be referred to the opposition between a subjectivist and an objectivist sociological approach. Then, it suggests that the contradictions of Bourdieu's theoretical logic can be explained by the evolution of Bourdieu's social thought from an objectivist to a subjectivist phase, the watershed between the two being the development, starting the Eighties, of field theory and the general theory of the economy of practices.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.