Abstract

Topological entanglement entropy has been extensively used as an indicator of topologically ordered phases. We study the conditions needed for two-dimensional topologically trivial states to exhibit spurious contributions that contaminates topological entanglement entropy. We show that if the state at the boundary of a subregion is a stabilizer state, then it has a non-zero spurious contribution to the region if and only if, the state is in a non-trivial one-dimensional $G_1\times G_2$ symmetry-protected-topological (SPT) phase. However, we provide a candidate of a boundary state that has a non-zero spurious contribution but does not belong to any such SPT phase.

Highlights

  • Ordered phases are gapped quantum phases that cannot be detected by conventional local order parameters

  • We study the underlying mechanism behind spurious Topological entanglement entropy (TEE) in the trivial phase

  • We model the degrees of freedom at the boundaries of regions [Fig. 1(b)] by using matrixproduct states (MPSs) [11]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Ordered phases are gapped quantum phases that cannot be detected by conventional local order parameters. To extract the TEE from a ground state, one can calculate suitable linear combinations of entropies for certain subsystems [see, e.g., Fig. 1(a)], known as conditional mutual information (CMI) in quantum information theory, such that the first leading terms cancel out [1,2]. In general, Eq (1) could contain an additional term, and the above argument does not always work This additional contribution, called spurious TEE [6,7], results in positive CMI for states in the trivial phase. We provide numerical evidence that, in general, there exist boundary states that have nonzero spurious TEE but do not belong to any such SPT phase. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of the mechanism of spurious TEE beyond the on-site G1 × G2 SPT phase at the boundary

MATRIX-PRODUCT-STATE MODEL OF BOUNDARY STATES
CHARACTERIZATION BY OPERATOR-ALGEBRA
RELATION TO SYMMETRY-PROTECTEDTOPOLOGICAL PHASES
A NONTRIVIAL EXAMPLE
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call