Abstract

Conferences are ideal platforms for studying gender gaps in science because they are important cultural events that reflect barriers to women in academia. Here, we explored women's participation in ecology conferences by analyzing female representation, behavior, and personal experience at the 1st Meeting of the Iberian Society of Ecology (SIBECOL). The conference had 722 attendees, 576 contributions, and 27 scientific sessions. The gender of attendees and presenters was balanced (48/52% women/men), yet only 29% of the contributions had a woman as last author. Moreover, men presented most of the keynote talks (67%) and convened most of the sessions. Our results also showed that only 32% of the questions were asked by women, yet the number of questions raised by women increased when the speaker or the convener was a woman. Finally, the post-conference survey revealed that attendees had a good experience and did not perceive the event as a threatening context for women. Yet, differences in the responses between genders suggest that women tended to have a worse experience than their male counterparts. Although our results showed clear gender biases, most of the participants of the conference failed to detect it. Overall, we highlight the challenge of increasing women's scientific leadership, visibility and interaction in scientific conferences and we suggest several recommendations for creating inclusive meetings, thereby promoting equal opportunities for all participants.

Highlights

  • Gender imbalances are pervasive in science, with women underrepresented at senior academic positions [1]

  • We used as a case study the 1st Meeting of the Iberian Society of Ecology (SIBECOL; http:// www.sibecol.org/), which was held in February 2019 in Barcelona, Spain

  • The proportion of female presenters differed among contribution types: almost half of the presenters were women for poster (55%), regular (49%) and plenary (44%) contributions, while only the 33% of keynote talks were presented by women (S1 Table in S3 Appendix)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gender imbalances are pervasive in science, with women underrepresented at senior academic positions [1]. While the demographic inertia from past policies may partially explain this trend [2, 3], gender bias is still evident in some of the key achievements that ground academic career progression, including the acquisition of prestigious grants or prizes [4], authorship positions in research articles [5], or invitations at conferences [6]. These gender imbalances, alarming by themselves, reduce the visibility of women researchers and might trigger vicious circles of gender bias that explain the persistence of the glass ceiling (sensu [7]). Thereby, assessing the factors preventing the success of women in science is critical to enhance their success and an equitable future in scientific disciplines

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call