Abstract

Solving and/or evaluating given problems or decision making in place and in real time is a goal of the analytical chemistry science. In this context, the performance of a commercial portable miniaturized liquid chromatograph (minLC) with LED UV (255 nm) detector was compared with those provided by two lab minLCs (capillary and nano) coupled on-line to in-valve in-tube solid phase microextraction (IT-SPME) with diode array detector (DAD). In addition, responses of the portable LC for in-field analysis in several conditions were tested. Besides, two evaluation tools, BETTER criteria for portability and HEXAGON pictogram for sustainability and greenness were applied for comparison purposes. The benchtop LCs provided lower limits of detection (LODs) as expected, in the order of low µg L−1, than those achieved by the portable LC, with LODs around mg L−1 for compounds covering several polarities (logKow between -1.72 and 3.82). The used portable LC gave excellent resolution, reducing the analysis time and being the consumption of solvents negligible. As a practical application, fruit washing residual waters, which contained a suitable level of concentrations of several biocides for employing the portable minLC, were analyzed and quantified from the three minLCs as a proof of concept with comparable results.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call