Abstract
ABSTRACTThe rather inflamed debate over Eurocentrism in Translation Studies over the past few years seems to be pointing to a new Turn in TS, following on the Cultural Turn of the 1990s and the Sociological Turn of the 2000s: an Intercivilizational Turn, focused no longer on “centers” of “civilization” but the interstices and relationships between civilizations. Orientalism has long been one such intercivilizational relationship; Occidentalism has more recently been emerging as a rival to that. The article seeks to show that much of what we take to be most innovative in both the “Eurocentric”/“Orientalist” and the “Occidentalist” approaches to TS has emerged out of the influence of Chinese thought on Western thinkers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
