Abstract

Surface water quality management requires foresighted decision making regarding long-term investments. It should consider multiple objectives (e.g. related to different pollutants and costs), integrate multiple sources of pollution (point and diffuse sources), and external conditions that change over time (climate, population and land-use changes). Multi-attribute value theory can support such decisions, especially the development of an assessment method. Integrated surface water quality assessment methods including micropollutants are currently lacking or in development in many countries. Important steps for the development of such an immission oriented and integrated surface water quality assessment method are discussed in this paper and exemplified for organic micropollutants. The proposed assessment method goes beyond simple pass-fail criteria for single substances. It provides a continuous assessment on a scale from zero to one based on five color-coded water quality classes and suggestions for the visualization of assessment results. It takes into account the toxicity of the micropollutants and their mixture to aquatic organisms by comparing measured concentrations to environmental quality standards (EQS). The focus of this paper is on aggregation over multiple substances and time. Advantages and disadvantages of different aggregation methods are discussed as well as their implications for practice. The consequences of different aggregation methods are illustrated with didactical examples and by an application of the proposed water quality assessment method to pesticide monitoring data from Switzerland. Recommendations are provided that account for the purpose of the assessment. Furthermore, the paper illustrates how the proposed method can facilitate dealing with uncertainty and a transparent communication of monitoring results to support water quality management decisions.

Highlights

  • Micropollutants are increasingly recognized as a threat to freshwater ecosystems (Schwarzenbach et al, 2006) and many countries set up monitoring programs for micropollutants in surface waters

  • To account for the fact that the assessment of single substances can only be equal or better than the assessment of mixture toxicity, we propose an aggregation function for the nodes "no risk of chronic toxicity" and "no risk of acute toxicity" that takes the same value as the nodes "no risk of chronic mixture toxicity" and "no risk of acute mixture toxicity", respectively. (This can be implemented by a minimum aggregation.) This means that the assessment of single substances does not affect the higher level objectives, but it serves as additional information to evaluate, if the risk is mainly due to single substances or due to a mixture of substances (Price and Han, 2011)

  • If we provide only two or three instead of five water quality classes, we lose information, but how much this reduces the uncertainty of the classification depends on whether the estimated values are close to a class boundary or not

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Micropollutants (e.g. pesticides, pharmaceuticals) are increasingly recognized as a threat to freshwater ecosystems (Schwarzenbach et al, 2006) and many countries set up monitoring programs for micropollutants in surface waters. Integrated assessment methods are lacking that translate individual measurements into an overall assessment of the water quality state, going beyond pass/fail criteria of single substances and single monitoring samples This makes it difficult to assess the overall water quality and to follow spatial and temporal developments at various scales. Monitoring and assessment usually serves multiple purposes and has to address different audiences It should inform experts by allowing detailed analyses with high temporal and spatial resolution to identify deficits and potential management actions, and it should provide a synthesized overview to inform policy makers, stakeholders, or the public and to support the planning of management actions in other sectors, such as morphological river restoration. The aim of this paper is to support the development of integrative assessment methods for the water quality of surface waters

Methods
Illustration of results with real monitoring data
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call