Towards a comprehensive evaluation of V-I-S sub-pixel fractions and land surface temperature for urban land-use classification in the USA

Abstract

Remote-sensing image classification based on the vegetation–impervious surface–soil (V-I-S) model and land-surface temperature (LST) has proved to be more efficient in characterizing the urban landscape than conventional spectral-based classification. However, current literature emphasizes discussion of the classifier's accuracy improvement achieved by the input of V-I-S fractions and LST over conventional spectral-based classification while ignoring the stability evaluation. Hence, this study proposes an evaluation framework for exploring the superiority of the input features and the stability of classifiers by integrating statistical randomization techniques and a kappa-error diagram. The evaluation framework was applied to case studies for demonstrating the superiority of V-I-S fractions and LST in the context of urban land-use classification with five different types of classifiers, including the maximum likelihood classifier (MLC), the tree classifier, the Bagging classifier, the random forest (RF) and the support vector machine (SVM). It followed that the use of V-I-S fractions and LST (1) could alleviate the ‘salt and pepper’ effect; (2) is preferred by tree and tree-based ensembles for branch splitting; (3) could produce classification trees with less complexity; (4) could benefit the stability of classifiers in addition to the accuracy improvement; and (5) could allow histograms following nearly normal distribution in its feature space, which boosts the performance of MLC. It is shown that MLC becomes comparable with modern classifiers when trained with V-I-S fractions and LST combination. Because of its adequacy and simplicity, MLC is recommended for urban land-use classification when V-I-S fractions and LST are used as the only input features. However, replacing them with, or including, the band reflectance might degrade MLC. A direct use of spectral band reflectance is not recommended for any of the classification approaches being considered in this study, except for SVM, which is the most robust classifier as it has a consistently high performance for all the input feature combinations. We recommend using tree-based ensemble classifiers or SVM when V-I-S fractions and LST as well as the band reflectance are all used in the classification. The proposed evaluation framework can also be applied to the assessment of input features and classifiers in other remote-sensing classification endeavours.