Abstract

In the aftermath of the subprime crisis the importance of model risk has come to be understood, leading regulators to ask for model risk measurement and management in financial institutions. On the other hand, in spite of recent advances, the subject still lacks a clear and widely accepted methodology as is the case for market or credit risk: although the methods in these fields are questioned and can be improved, there is, as far as practical issues are concerned, a wide acceptance of some guiding principles. This is not the case for model risk. We argue that the mainstream research has to be supplemented by new insights and methods when it comes, for example, to over-the-counter credit products. We propose, in particular, a new method, called model value-at-risk, that aims to answer such questions as, what is the model-dependent value-at-risk of an investment at one year at a confidence level of 95%? We have chosen the case study of bespoke collateralized debt obligation tranches, but most of our reasoning could be adapted to other complex contracts where market prices are not available and the choice of benchmark pricing method is subject to uncertainty: for example, mortgage-backed and residential mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations, leveraged buyouts and real options. These topics will be the subject of further research.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.