Abstract

Neutral boundary layer (NBL) flow fields, commonly used in turbine load studies and design, are generated using spectral procedures in stochastic simulation. For large utility-scale turbines, stable boundary layer (SBL) flow fields are of great interest because they are often accompanied by enhanced wind shear, wind veer, and even low-level jets (LLJs). The generation of SBL flow fields, in contrast to simpler stochastic simulation for NBL, requires computational fluid dynamics (CFD) procedures to capture the physics and noted characteristics—such as shear and veer—that are distinct from those seen in NBL flows. At present, large-eddy simulation (LES) is the most efficient CFD procedure for SBL flow field generation and related wind turbine loads studies. Design standards, such as from the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), provide guidance albeit with simplifying assumptions (one such deals with assuming constant variance of turbulence over the rotor) and recommend standard target turbulence power spectra and coherence functions to allow NBL flow field simulation. In contrast, a systematic SBL flow field simulation procedure has not been offered for design or for site assessment. It is instructive to compare LES-generated SBL flow fields with stochastic NBL flow fields and associated loads which we evaluate for a 5-MW turbine; in doing so, we seek to isolate distinguishing characteristics of wind shear, wind veer, and turbulence variation over the rotor plane in the alternative flow fields and in the turbine loads. Because of known differences in NBL-stochastic and SBL-LES wind fields but an industry preference for simpler stochastic simulation in design practice, this study investigates if one can reproduce stable atmospheric conditions using stochastic approaches with appropriate corrections for shear, veer, turbulence, etc. We find that such simple tuning cannot consistently match turbine target SBL load statistics, even though this is possible in some cases. As such, when there is a need to consider different stability regimes encountered by a wind turbine, easy solutions do not exist and large-eddy simulation at least for the stable boundary layer is needed.

Highlights

  • In recent years, wind energy has witnessed faster growth worldwide than almost all other renewables, with the exception of solar energy

  • For the out-of-plane bending moment (OoPBM) case, Step 1 is seen to increase the mean equivalent fatigue load (EFL) by almost 50% compared to the baseline neutral boundary layer (NBL) wind field; this increased mean value is almost comparable to that for the stable boundary layer (SBL) case

  • EFL, these values never reach the same level as seen for the SBL wind field

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wind energy has witnessed faster growth worldwide than almost all other renewables, with the exception of solar energy. Aggressive renewable portfolio standards have sought to increase the percentage of renewable sources in the energy portfolios of many states in the United States; this, along with production tax credits, has led to a boom in wind-generated electricity production. While this is encouraging news, some challenges have become evident. In the present work and in ongoing studies [1,2,3,4], the authors are seeking to extend the design paradigm to allow a reliability-based assessment of wind turbines against fatigue and extreme limit states that includes evaluation of turbine loads for suites of inflow turbulence flow fields that have the spatial structure and characteristics that reflect a wide range of atmospheric stability conditions

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call