Toward Advancing Precision Environmental Health: Developing a Customized Exposure Burden Score to PFAS Mixtures to Enable Equitable Comparisons Across Population Subgroups, Using Mixture Item Response Theory.

Abstract

Quantifying a person's cumulative exposure burden to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) mixtures is important for risk assessment, biomonitoring, and reporting of results to participants. However, different people may be exposed to different sets of PFASs due to heterogeneity in the exposure sources and patterns. Applying a single measurement model for the entire population (e.g., by summing concentrations of all PFAS analytes) assumes that each PFAS analyte is equally informative to PFAS exposure burden for all individuals. This assumption may not hold if PFAS exposure sources systematically differ within the population. However, the sociodemographic, dietary, and behavioral characteristics that underlie systematic exposure differences may not be known, or may be due to a combination of these factors. Therefore, we used mixture item response theory, an unsupervised psychometrics and data science method, to develop a customized PFAS exposure burden scoring algorithm. This scoring algorithm ensures that PFAS burden scores can be equitably compared across population subgroups. We applied our methods to PFAS biomonitoring data from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013-2018). Using mixture item response theory, we found that participants with higher household incomes had higher PFAS burden scores. Asian Americans had significantly higher PFAS burden compared with non-Hispanic Whites and other race/ethnicity groups. However, some disparities were masked when using summed PFAS concentrations as the exposure metric. This work demonstrates that our summary PFAS burden metric, accounting for sources of exposure variation, may be a more fair and informative estimate of PFAS exposure.