Abstract

This article explores the tensions between internal and external quality assurance processes, making a case for the preeminence of internal actions to ensure the capacity of institutions to respond quickly and effectively to the rapidly evolving global conditions affecting all of higher education. As the forms and means of formal and informal learning evolve more rapidly than quality assurance and accrediting bodies can adapt, institutions themselves will have to take the steps necessary to ensure that students are actually learning at levels represented by a new array of credentials and to offer credible evidence to employers and others that the credentials are indeed accurate reflections of competence. There is a place for quality assurance bodies, but these agencies will find it in their best interest to operate in the areas where they can offer the greatest societal value by articulating the standards that define integrity and quality. Both institutions and quality assurance bodies alike must join forces to recognize that expectations for what actually constitutes quality, competence, and integrity transcend national borders, cultural differences, the ages, occupations or locations of learners, and outmoded notions of prestige. It is a new era where bold ideas and strong ideals can reshape our understanding of what it means to learn throughout life at demonstrable levels of quality and competence.

Highlights

  • Nations around the world have become increasingly concerned about quality in higher education—in their own countries and in competitor nations

  • Concern has grown to alarm as degrees have not always led to meaningful jobs or careers because graduates are not prepared for work in a globalized economy. This is a concern that already transcends national boundaries, and at this very moment it is laying the foundation for a new era of global interdependence as corporations, nonprofits, and, whole nations compete for the world’s best talent

  • How successfully we all navigate this new era depends largely on how well we prepare our graduates for their responsibilities—as citizens as well as workers--in a rapidly changing world

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nations around the world have become increasingly concerned about quality in higher education—in their own countries and in competitor nations. Concern has grown to alarm as degrees have not always led to meaningful jobs or careers because graduates are not prepared for work in a globalized economy. This is a concern that already transcends national boundaries, and at this very moment it is laying the foundation for a new era of global interdependence as corporations, nonprofits, and, whole nations compete for the world’s best talent. How successfully we all navigate this new era depends largely on how well we prepare our graduates for their responsibilities—as citizens as well as workers--in a rapidly changing world

Open Access
Internal Versus External Quality Assurance
Implications for Internal Quality Assurance
Composition of the Academic Workforce
Lessons Learned
Advice for the Future
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call