Toward a New Feminist Theory of Rape

paper. 1 For general arguments against an excessive philosophical preoccupation with epistemology, see Jacques Derrida, Dissemination (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981); John Gunnell, Between Philosophy and Politics (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1986); Mark Krupnick, ed., Displacement (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1983); Paul Kress, "Against Epistemology," Journal of Politics 41, no. 2 (May 1979): 526-42. For specific arguments against foundationalism, see Richard Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979); Richard Bernstein, Beyond Objectivism and Relativism (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983); Don Herzog, Without Foundations: Justification in Political Theory (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1985). It is worth noting the irony that even those most intent on repudiating epistemology on the grounds that traditional epistemological concerns involve claims altogether beyond the possibilities for human knowledge are themselves advancing epistemological claims.

Previous articleNext article No AccessViewpointPacifying the Forces: Drafting Women in the Interests of PeaceSara RuddickSara Ruddick Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Signs Volume 8, Number 3Spring, 1983Women and Violence Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/493986 Views: 22Total views on this site Citations: 36Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1983 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Dara Kay Cohen, Connor Huff, Robert Schub At War and at Home: The Consequences of US Women Combat Casualties, Journal of Conflict Resolution 65, no.44 (Oct 2020): 647–671.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002720964952Guðrún Sif Friðriksdóttir Soldiering as an obstacle to manhood? Masculinities and ex-combatants in Burundi, Critical Military Studies 7, no.11 (Jul 2018): 61–78.https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2018.1494884Julia Welland Feeling and militarism at Ms Veteran America, International Feminist Journal of Politics 23, no.11 (Dec 2020): 58–79.https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2020.1858719Jakana L. Thomas Wolves in Sheep's Clothing: Assessing the Effect of Gender Norms on the Lethality of Female Suicide Terrorism, International Organization 75, no.33 (Mar 2021): 769–802.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818321000035Charlotte Wagnsson, Eva-Karin Olsson, Isabella Nilsen Gendered Views in a Feminist State: Swedish Opinions on Crime, Terrorism, and National Security, Gender & Society 34, no.55 (Aug 2020): 790–817.https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243220946029Freda Burdett, Lynne Gouliquer, Carmen Poulin Culture of Corrections : The Experiences of Women Correctional Officers, Feminist Criminology 13, no.33 (Mar 2018): 329–349.https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085118767974Dalea Bean Introduction, (Dec 2017): 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68585-4_1Claire Duncanson Anti-Militarist Feminist Approaches to Researching Gender and the Military, (Jun 2017): 39–58.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51677-0_3Helena Carreiras Women and Peace Operations, (Jan 2015): 69–90.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137442253_4Elizabeth Frazer, Kimberly Hutchings Revisiting Ruddick: Feminism, pacifism and non-violence, Journal of International Political Theory 10, no.11 (Feb 2014): 109–124.https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088213507191Jessica Auchter Gendering Terror, International Feminist Journal of Politics 14, no.11 (Mar 2012): 121–139.https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2011.619780Gerhard Kümmel Frauen in militärischen Organisationen, (Jan 2012): 367–391.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93456-3_16Mary H. Moran Gender, Militarism, and Peace-Building: Projects of the Postconflict Moment, Annual Review of Anthropology 39, no.11 (Oct 2010): 261–274.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164406Laura Sjoberg Gender, Just War, and Non-state Actors, (Jan 2009): 151–176.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101791_7Valerie M. Hudson, Mary Caprioli, Bonnie Ballif-Spanvill, Rose McDermott, Chad F. Emmett The Heart of the Matter: The Security of Women and the Security of States, International Security 33, no.33 (Jan 2009): 7–45.https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2009.33.3.7Lana Obradovic 'Being All She Can Be: Gender Integration in Nato Military Forces', SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1462485Gerhard Kümmel Frauen im Militär, (Jan 2006): 51–60.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90086-5_5Christine Mason Women, Violence and Nonviolent Resistance in East Timor, Journal of Peace Research 42, no.66 (Nov 2005): 737–749.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343305057890Gerhard Kümmel Frauen im Militär, (Jan 2005): 114–134.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10804-7_6Gerhard Kümmel Frauen im Militär, (Jan 2004): 60–69.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93538-0_6Mary Caprioli Gender Equality and State Aggression: The Impact of Domestic Gender Equality on State First Use of Force, International Interactions 29, no.33 (Jul 2003): 195–214.https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620304595Gerhard Kümmel When Boy Meets Girl: The `Feminization' of the Military, Current Sociology 50, no.55 (Sep 2002): 615–639.https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392102050005002Christine Sylvester Feminist International Relations, 41 (Sep 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491719Laura L. Miller Feminism and the exclusion of army women from combat, Gender Issues 16, no.33 (Jun 1998): 33–64.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-998-0021-1Catherine Speck Women's war memorials and citizenship, Australian Feminist Studies 11, no.2323 (Apr 1996): 129–145.https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.1996.9994810Jacqui True Feminism, (Jan 1996): 210–251.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24743-1_8Melissa S. Herbert Feminism, militarism, and attitudes toward the role of women in the military, Feminist Issues 14, no.22 (Jun 1994): 25–48.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685655Lucinda J. Peach An Alternative to Pacifism? Feminism and Just-War Theory, Hypatia 9, no.22 (Mar 2020): 152–172.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00438.xJan Pettman Gendering international relations, Australian Journal of International Affairs 47, no.11 (May 1993): 47–62.https://doi.org/10.1080/10357719308445097Jan Jindy Pettman Gender and international politics, Australian Feminist Studies 8, no.1717 (Mar 1993): 181–197.https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.1993.9994686Jan Jindy Pettman A feminist perspective on peace and security∗, Interdisciplinary Peace Research 4, no.22 (Oct 1992): 58–71.https://doi.org/10.1080/14781159208412753Janna Thompson Women and war, Women's Studies International Forum 14, no.1-21-2 (Jan 1991): 63–75.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(91)90084-UChristine Sylvester I. Some Dangers in Merging Feminist and Peace Projects, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 12, no.44 (Oct 1987): 493–509.https://doi.org/10.1177/030437548701200404 Susan Schweik Writing War Poetry like a Woman, Critical Inquiry 13, no.33 (Oct 2015): 532–556.https://doi.org/10.1086/448407 Phyllis Mack Feminine Behavior and Radical Action: Franciscans, Quakers, and the Followers of Gandhi, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 11, no.33 (Oct 2015): 457–477.https://doi.org/10.1086/494251Barbara Roberts The death of machothink: Feminist research and the transformation of peace studies, Women's Studies International Forum 7, no.44 (Jan 1984): 195–200.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(84)90042-6

n the course of conducting fieldwork in 1993-94 in Durban, South Africa, I attended a training workshop for Zenzele field-workers.' Zenzele was a black women's organization that focused on educating and uplifting black women living in rural and urban KwaZulu and Natal.2 There we were told a story of women's transnational cooperation that struck me as surprisingly reminiscent of colonial relations between European and "native" women. On June 29, 1994, Lyndsay Hacket-Pain, then vice president of the Associated Country Women of the World (ACWW), addressed a gathering of ACWW affiliate organizations the Federation of Women's Institutes (FWI) of Natal and Zululand and the Natal and KwaZulu Zenzele Women's Association (Zenzele). Hacket-Pain, from the head office in London, had been traveling around South Africa visiting various ACWW affiliate organizations and the projects they had undertaken. A

Femicide is cloaked in silence and has rarely been investigated. This article aims to break the silence by reexamining the definition of the crime. The current definition which deals only with the actual killing of the victim is quite narrow indicating that the phenomenon is still misunderstood. I will suggest how this definition can be expanded contextually grounded and improved. The current definition adequately describes the crime of killing a woman but it fails to cover the arduous process leading up to her death. In this context death needs redefining. Death in femicide is currently defined medicolegally as the inability to breathe. In the new definition that I propose death has already occurred by the time a female is put on "death row"--that is when she is effectively sentenced to death by murder and lives under the continual threat of being killed. Even at this point I consider her a victim of femicide and I thus redefine death as the inability to live. Although victims of femicide are technically alive they are in a mode of life that they never wanted and completely reject a mode that is perhaps best described as death-in-life. (excerpt)

EDITORS' NOTE: Howz serious and widespread a problem is sexual harassment in our universities? What means will effectively diminish its incidence without violating the rights of individuals? Each of thefollowing essays answers one of these two questions. In the first, Bernice Lott, Mary Ellen Reilly, and Dale Howard describe the results of a 1979 survey that examined a sample of the entire University of Rhode Island population. Its purpose was to determine how many of the respondents in the sample group had personal knowledge of or had experienced any form of sexual assault, intimidation, or insult; how they had responded to assault; and their beliefs about harassment in general. In the second essay, Judith Berman Brandenburg delineates a response to the problem worked out at Yale University: the establishment of a grievance procedure administered through a specially selected board. The process of this honest search for answers uncovers other questions: Do we have a definition of sexual harassment upon which most people will agree? Is power thefactor that transforms what may be cajolery into harassment? If so, power in what forms? Do these forms make the problem invulnerable to any solution? With these essays we open a dialogue on such questions. We invite your letters in response, in the hope that through the exchange we canfurther advance feminist efforts to analyze-and to overcome-this pernicious form of sexual injustice.

L'A. etudie la situation des femmes et plus particulierement des meres dans les zones de conflit. Elle s'efforce de comprendre la nature du lien entre maternite, nationalisme et conflit. Elle analyse le role du sexe dans les situations de guerre, la vie dans les regions situees sur la zone de front au Liban et la signification et les pratiques en matiere de maternite chez les femmes palestiniennes. Elle retrace les grandes etapes du conflit qui a ensanglante le Liban entre 1968 et 1982 ; evoque la situation des femmes au cours de «la guerre des pierres», l'intifada et souligne que celles-ci sont presentees d'une maniere symbolique, «iconique» au sein des discours politiques palestiniens. Elle s'interroge quant au statut social des meres, quant a la signification de leur appartenance sociale dans le cadre de ces discours

Dans cet article, l'A s'interesse a l'ideologie de genre concernant la securite de l'Etat. En se basant sur les ecrits de Thomas Hobbes a propos de l'autorite, l'A revient sur le concept patriarcal de protection de la femme et de l'enfant, les subordonnant ainsi a des citoyens de seconde zone. L'A met en relation le comportement masulin traditionnel avec l'engouement pour les conflits armes internationaux, et les appels et mouvements feministes pour la paix, en s'intorrgeant sur l'avenir de la democratie aux Etats-Unis depuis les evenements du 11 septembre 2001

I AGREE WITH SEVERAL of Susan Hekman's central arguments (in this issue). Feminist standpoint theory has indeed made a major contribution to feminist theory and, as she indicates at the end, to late twentieth-century efforts to develop more useful ways of thinking about the production of knowledge in local and global political economies. We can note that feminists are not the only contemporary social theorists to struggle with projects of extricating ourselves from some of the constraints of those philosophies of modernity that began to emerge in Europe three or more centuries ago. Moreover, Hekman is certainly right that current reevaluations of marxian projects, of the "difference" issues, and of poststructuralism are three sites of both resources and challenges to the further development of standpoint theories, as they must be also for other contemporary social theorizing. These last three sets of issues are intimately related. The modern understanding of how to go about knowledge seeking, retained in the marxian epistemology, assumed that one should imagine a kind of single, ideal knower, "homogeneously" constituted since he purportedly represented no particular cultural identity, interests, or discourses. The proletarian standpoint, once it was generalized as the truly human standpoint, provided just such an ideal unitary knower no less than did social contract theory's "rational man." Issues neither of differences between knowers nor of the cultural constitution of knowledge-the multicultural and poststructuralist issue about discourses-could arise as long as knowledge acquisition was figured as performing the "God-trick," as Donna Haraway famously put the point (1988). Thus, early articulations of feminist standpoint theory retained some of these problematic modernist assumptions about truth and reality. However, it seems to me that Hekman distorts the central project of standpoint theorists when she characterizes it as one of figuring out how to justify the truth of feminist claims to more accurate accounts of reality. Rather, it is relations between power and knowledge that concern these thinkers. They have wanted to identify ways that male supremacy and the production of knowledge have coconstituted each other in the past and

H E P E R SI S T E N CE OF women's subordination throughout history and across many cultures presents a difficult puzzle; although women are clearly assertive actors who struggle for better conditions for themselves and for their families, their efforts often seem to produce limited or ephemeral results. The recent widening of opportunities for some women is unusual, and when placed in historical and cross-cultural perspective, its future seems uncertain.2 In

Postbook: Working the Ruins of Feminist Ethnography

What Is Third‐Wave Feminism? A New Directions Essay

Previous articleNext article No AccessGlobal Civil Society and the Local Costs of Belonging: Defining Violence against Women in RussiaJulie HemmentJulie HemmentDepartment of AnthropologyUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst Search for more articles by this author Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Massachusetts, AmherstPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Signs Volume 29, Number 3Spring 2004 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/381104 Views: 418Total views on this site Citations: 35Citations are reported from Crossref © 2004 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Kristians Zalāns, Kārlis Lakševics, Ilze Mileiko Geographical Imagination and Experiences of Violence and Violence Prevention in Post-Soviet Space, Gender, Place & Culture 50 (Jun 2022): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2022.2083588Gesine Fuchs, Eva Maria Hinterhuber Öffentlich und privat in Osteuropa, (Jul 2022): 425–457.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35401-5_15Bettina Engels All good things come from below? Scalar constructions of the ‘local’ in conflicts over mining, Political Geography 84 (Jan 2021): 102295.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102295Maria Davidenko An Epistemic Community in Abeyance: The Work of Russian Anti-Violence Organisations in a Restrictive Legal Climate, Europe-Asia Studies 72, no.88 (Oct 2020): 1329–1351.https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1817861Bettina Engels, Melanie Müller Northern theories, Southern movements? Contentious politics in Africa through the lens of social movement theory, Journal of Contemporary African Studies 37, no.11 (Apr 2019): 72–92.https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2019.1607967Janet Elise Johnson Feminist Mobilization: How Bait-and-Switch Male Dominance Undermines Feminism and How Feminists Fight Back, (Sep 2017): 109–140.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60279-0_4Tuija Virkki At the Interface of National and Transnational: The Development of Finnish Policies against Domestic Violence in Terms of Gender Equality, Social Sciences 6, no.11 (Mar 2017): 31.https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6010031 Introduction, (Jan 2015): 1–23.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375289-001 Sex Trafficking and the Making of a Feminist Subject of Analysis, (Jan 2015): 29–52.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375289-003 The Natasha Trade and the Post-Cold War Reframing of Precarity, (Jan 2015): 53–84.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375289-004 Second World/Second Sex, (Jan 2015): 89–120.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375289-006 Lost in Transition, (Jan 2015): 121–157.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375289-007 Freedom as Choice and the Neoliberal Economism of Trafficking Discourse, (Jan 2015): 163–186.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375289-009 Conclusion, (Jan 2015): 187–193.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375289-010 Notes, (Jan 2015): 195–217.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375289-011 References, (Jan 2015): 219–246.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375289-012Nana Akua Anyidoho, Gordon Crawford Leveraging national and global links for local rights advocacy: WACAM's challenge to the power of transnational gold mining in Ghana, Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement 35, no.44 (Aug 2014): 483–502.https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2014.936369Bettina Engels „Glokale“ Kämpfe: Konflikte um hohe Nahrungsmittelpreise in Burkina Faso, Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 27, no.33 (Feb 2016): 61–69.https://doi.org/10.1515/fjsb-2014-0309Janet Elise Johnson and Aino Saarinen Twenty-First-Century Feminisms under Repression: Gender Regime Change and the Women’s Crisis Center Movement in Russia, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38, no.33 (Jul 2015): 543–567.https://doi.org/10.1086/668515Catherine Buerger Achieving Women's Economic Rights, in Policy and in Practice, (Jan 2013): 204–220.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235600.010Nanette Funk Contra Fraser on Feminism and Neoliberalism, Hypatia 28, no.11 (Mar 2020): 179–196.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01259.xMargaret Abraham, Bandana Purkayastha Making a difference: Linking research and action in practice, pedagogy, and policy for social justice: Introduction, Current Sociology 60, no.22 (Mar 2012): 123–141.https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111429215Jennifer Suchland Is Postsocialism Transnational?, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 36, no.44 (Jul 2015): 837–862.https://doi.org/10.1086/658899Kirsti Stuvøy Symbolic Power and (In)Security: The Marginalization of Women’s Security in Northwest Russia1, International Political Sociology 4, no.44 (Dec 2010): 401–418.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00113.xKatalin Fábián Mores and gains: The EU's influence on domestic violence policies among its new post-communist member states, Women's Studies International Forum 33, no.11 (Jan 2010): 54–67.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2009.11.006Kristen Ghodsee Revisiting the United Nations decade for women: Brief reflections on feminism, capitalism and Cold War politics in the early years of the international women's movement, Women's Studies International Forum 33, no.11 (Jan 2010): 3–12.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2009.11.008J.R. Wies Boundaries in carework: A case study of domestic violence shelter advocates in the USA, Global Public Health 4, no.55 (Sep 2009): 464–476.https://doi.org/10.1080/17441690902815470Nitza Berkovitch, Neve Gordon The Political Economy of Transnational Regimes: The Case of Human Rights, International Studies Quarterly 52, no.44 (Dec 2008): 881–904.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00530.xMichael N. Humble, Brian E. Bride Fallout from Communism: The Role of Feminism in Fighting HIV/AIDS among Women in Russia, Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 17, no.3-43-4 (Oct 2008): 377–387.https://doi.org/10.1080/10911350802068169Jennifer Wies Professionalizing Human Services: A Case of Domestic Violence Shelter Advocates, Human Organization 67, no.22 (Jun 2008): 221–233.https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.67.2.l43m2v54221711l3Candice D. Ortbals Jumbled Women's Activism: Subnational And International Influences On Galician Equality Politics, International Feminist Journal of Politics 9, no.33 (Aug 2007): 359–378.https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740701438242Sirkku K. Hellsten Can Feminism Survive Capitalism? Challenges Feminist Discourses Face in Promoting Women’s Rights in Post-Soviet Europe, (Jan 2006): 53–66.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502901_4Sarah D. Phillips Civil society and healing: Theorizing women's social activism in post-soviet Ukraine, Ethnos 70, no.44 (Dec 2005): 489–514.https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840500419766MICHELE RIVKIN-FISH "Change Yourself and the Whole World Will Become Kinder": Russian Activists for Reproductive Health and the Limits of Claims Making for Women, Medical Anthropology Quarterly 18, no.33 (Sep 2004): 281–304.https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2004.18.3.281Katalin Fábián Against Domestic Violence: The Interaction of Global Networks with Local Activism in Central Europe, (): 111–152.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-3759(06)88006-X

Previous articleNext article No AccessWhen the Girls Are Men: Negotiating Gender and Sexual Dynamics in a Study of Drag QueensVerta Taylor, and Leila J. RuppVerta TaylorDepartment of SociologyUniversity of California, Santa Barbara (Taylor) Search for more articles by this author , and Leila J. RuppWomen's Studies ProgramUniversity of California, Santa Barbara (Rupp) Search for more articles by this author Department of SociologyUniversity of California, Santa Barbara (Taylor)Women's Studies ProgramUniversity of California, Santa Barbara (Rupp)PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Signs Volume 30, Number 4Summer 2005New Feminist Approaches to Social Science Methodologies. Special Issue Editors Sandra Harding and Kathryn Norberg Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/428421 Views: 1751Total views on this site Citations: 19Citations are reported from Crossref © 2005 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Brie Radis, Katharine Wenocur, Jeffrey Jin, Colleen Keeler A Rainbow For Reading: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study On Drag Queen Reading Programs, Journal of Creativity in Mental Health 17, no.33 (Mar 2021): 332–349.https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2021.1892557Anna Theresa Schmid, Shahin Payam “I Don’t Want to Have Sex as a Woman”: A Qualitative Study Exploring Sexuality and Sexual Practices of Drag Queens in Germany, Journal of Homosexuality 8 (Mar 2022): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2022.2051117Yoko Kanemasu, Gyozo Molnar ‘Representing’ the voices of Fijian women rugby players: Working with power differentials in transformative research, International Review for the Sociology of Sport 55, no.44 (Jul 2019): 399–415.https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690218818991Jae Basiliere Staging Dissents: Drag Kings, Resistance, and Feminist Masculinities, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 44, no.44 (May 2019): 979–1001.https://doi.org/10.1086/702034Emer O’Toole Panti Bliss still can’t get hitched: Meditations on performativity, drag, and gay marriage, Sexualities 22, no.33 (Nov 2017): 359–380.https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717741809Heidi M. Levitt, Francisco I. Surace, Emily E. Wheeler, Erik Maki, Darcy Alcántara, Melanie Cadet, Steven Cullipher, Sheila Desai, Gabriel Garza Sada, John Hite, Elena Kosterina, Sarah Krill, Charles Lui, Emily Manove, Ryan J. Martin, Courtney Ngai Drag Gender: Experiences of Gender for Gay and Queer Men who Perform Drag, Sex Roles 78, no.5-65-6 (Jul 2017): 367–384.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0802-7Phillip W. Schnarrs, Joshua G. Rosenberger, Vanessa Schick, Adolph Delgado, Lindsay Briggs, Brian Dodge, Michael Reece Difference in Condom Use Between Bear Concordant and Discordant Dyads During the Last Anal Sex Event, Journal of Homosexuality 64, no.22 (May 2016): 195–208.https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1174024Amy L. Darnell, Ahoo Tabatabai The Werk That Remains: Drag and the Mining of the Idealized Female Form, (Aug 2017): 91–101.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50618-0_7Lynda Johnston Gender and sexuality I, Progress in Human Geography 40, no.55 (Jul 2016): 668–678.https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515592109Nathaniel Simmons Speaking Like a Queen in RuPaul’s Drag Race: Towards a Speech Code of American Drag Queens, Sexuality & Culture 18, no.33 (Dec 2013): 630–648.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9213-2Luke John Mansillo Gays Donnt Vote Straight?: The Effect of Sexuality at the 2010 & 2013 Australian Federal Elections, and the Gap between Lesbians & Gay Men, SSRN Electronic Journal 16 (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2440351Kate W Read Queering the brothel: Identity construction and performance in Carson City, Nevada, Sexualities 16, no.3-43-4 (May 2013): 467–486.https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713481744Sarah Becker, Brittnie Aiello The continuum of complicity: “Studying up”/studying power as a feminist, anti-racist, or social justice venture, Women's Studies International Forum 38 (May 2013): 63–74.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.02.004Lynda Johnston Sites of excess: The spatial politics of touch for drag queens in Aotearoa New Zealand, Emotion, Space and Society 5, no.11 (Feb 2012): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2010.02.003 Sara O’Shaughnessy and Naomi T. Krogman A Revolution Reconsidered? Examining the Practice of Qualitative Research in Feminist Scholarship, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 37, no.22 (Jul 2015): 493–520.https://doi.org/10.1086/661726Leila J. Rupp, Verta Taylor Going Back and Giving Back: The Ethics of Staying in the Field, Qualitative Sociology 34, no.33 (Jul 2011): 483–496.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-011-9200-6Brooke Ackerly, Jacqui True Back to the future: Feminist theory, activism, and doing feminist research in an age of globalization, Women's Studies International Forum 33, no.55 (Sep 2010): 464–472.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2010.06.004Dana Berkowitz, Linda Liska Belgrave “She Works Hard for the Money”: Drag Queens and the Management of Their Contradictory Status of Celebrity and Marginality, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 39, no.22 (May 2010): 159–186.https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241609342193Judith Lorber Shifting Paradigms and Challenging Categories, Social Problems 53, no.44 (Nov 2006): 448–453.https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2006.53.4.448

L'A. reprend son essai feministe Under western eyes ecrit seize annees auparavant, dans le contexte d'un mouvement feministe transnational en pleine vitalite. Apres en avoir rappele les arguments centraux, elle analyse la reception qu'a eu cet article, puis tente de clarifier le sens qu'elle donne a des concepts-cles comme l'Occident ou le Tiers-Monde. Elle reengage le debat sur la relation entre le particulier et l'universel dans la theorie feministe. Elle tente enfin d'evaluer ce qui a change durant la periode qui s'est ecoulee depuis la parution de la premiere edition de Under western eyes. Elle inscrit parmi les nouveaux defis du feminisme le combat contre la mondialisation capitaliste et ses effets de predation dont les femmes sont plus particulierement victimes. A la suite de Vandana Shiva, elle s'insurge notamment contre la confiscation imperialiste des savoirs indigenes par le biais des brevets

New Feminist Approaches to Social Science Methodologies: An Introduction