Abstract
Judges are now players in the mass tort game.' Whatever approach any judge takes in managing a mass tort, judicial input is a critical factor in the ultimate progress of the litigation. To certify or not to certify, for example, is a question that must be answered with profound results for the outcome of the mass tort.2 Recognizing the role of judges, recent legal literature has suggested that the ubiquity and massness of the tort should lead to among judges. Through cooperation, judges can promote efficiency and horizontal equity in the adjudication.3 Cooperation among judges has been promoted in multiple and often confusing forms; cooperation has varyingly meant communication, coordination, collaboration, or in the negotiation
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
