Total laparoscopic tube hysterectomy: a safer option?

Abstract

Objective To compare outcomes in women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy performed with the assistance of a colpotomizing tube (TLTH), with those in women in whom a laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy (LAH) procedure was performed. Design A retrospective review of consecutive patients. Setting State health service patients were treated at Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, and private patients were treated by the same surgeons in three private hospitals in metropolitan Adelaide. Subjects A total of 227 women who underwent operation between January 1996 and August 1999. Interventions The women involved in the first two years of this study exclusively underwent an LAH, whilst those in the latter 18 months underwent a TLTH. Main outcome measures These included intraoperative complications, including significant haemorrhage, ureteric, bladder, vascular and bowel injury; postoperative complication rates for vault infection, late bowel and ureteric injury, and miscellaneous febrile morbidity. Also documented were the operating time, nonautologous blood transfusion, operation–discharge interval, and readmission with a complication. Results The women having the TLTH procedure had significantly fewer intraoperative complications (χ2 = 8.07, P = 0.004) in comparison with the LAH group; postoperative complications were not statistically different. The mean operating times and readmission rates with surgical complications were equivalent for the two groups. The hospital stay was shorter by 1.5 days for the women having a TLTH (t = 8.39, P < 0.001), and the estimated blood loss was less than half of that for the LAH patients (t = 8.94, P < 0.001); nonautologous blood transfusion was not needed in either group. Conclusion Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing the nondisposable colpotomizing tube and uterine manipulator has both fewer intraoperative complications and reduced blood loss when compared with laparovaginal hysterectomy, and is a safe alternative to LAH.