Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Factor V Leiden: Elevated Risks Isolated to Venous Thromboembolism Events

Abstract

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common procedure that requires consideration of preexisting comorbidities. Factor V Leiden (FVL), an inherited thrombophilia, is one such condition that predisposes patients to venous thromboembolism (VTE, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism). The present study aimed to characterize the risks associated with FVL patients undergoing THA and evaluate the effect of VTE chemoprophylactic agents on these risks. MethodsA total of 544,022 adult patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis indications between 2010 and October 2021 were identified in an administrative claims database. Of these, FVL was identified in 1,138 (0.21%). Patients who had and did not have FVL were matched at a 1:4 ratio (1,131 with FVL and 4,519 without FVL) based on age, sex, and Elixhauser comorbidity index. Univariable and multivariable analyses were assessed for 90-day complications. Implant survival at 5 years was assessed and compared with log-rank tests. The relative use of different chemoprophylactic agents, including aspirin, warfarin, heparin, or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), was assessed. Bleeding events and VTE were compared for those prescribed either aspirin or warfarin, heparin, or DOAC. A Bonferroni correction was applied. ResultsOn multivariable analysis, FVL patients were found to have increased odds of 90-day deep vein thrombosis (odds ratio (OR) = 9.20), pulmonary embolism (OR = 6.89), and aggregated severe and all adverse events (OR = 4.74 and 1.98, respectively), but not elevated risk of other perioperative adverse events or 5-year reoperations. More potent chemoprophylactic agents (warfarin, heparin, DOAC) reduced, but did not completely eliminate, the increased VTE risks (without increasing bleeding events). ConclusionsThis study quantified the significantly elevated VTE risk associated with FVL patients undergoing THA. The lack of difference in other specific adverse events and 5-year reoperations is reassuring. Clearly, chemoprophylactic agents are important in this population and may need further attention.