Abstract

<p>Mechanical weathering by freezing and thermal processes are influenced by climate. Topography modulates this climatic influence due to altitudinal decrease of temperature, modifying insolation due to rockwall aspects and insulation by snow cover. In this study, we (i) quantify rock fracture damage in the field, (ii) monitor rock surface temperature and snow cover, (iii) model frost weathering processes, (iv) quantify fracture kinematics and (v) assess how these processes contribute to rockwall erosion. For this purpose, we conducted measurements on rockwalls with different aspects along an altitudinal gradient ranging from 2,500 to 3,200 m in the Hungerli Valley, Swiss Alps, between 2016 and 2019.</p><p>(i) The geology of the Hungerli Valley comprises schisty quartz slate with inclusions of aplite and amphibolite. We conducted Rock Mass Strength (RMS) measurements and used fracture spacing and uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) measurements as proxies for mechanical weathering. RMS ranges from 62 to 77 for schisty quartz slate rockwalls, up to 73 for aplite and 74 for amphibolite. Fracture spacing and UCS reflect lithological differences of the catchment area suggesting a geological control on weathering efficacy. </p><p>(ii) Rock surface temperatures (RST) were monitored using temperature loggers. RST decreases with elevation from 2,500 to 2,900 m, however, increases again at 3,150 m potentially due to higher insolation on ridges. Snow cover duration shows a similar altitudinal trend. Due to aspect, RSTs are 2 to 4 °C warmer on south facing rockwalls with significant shorter snow cover period.</p><p>(iii) We used measured RST to drive frost cracking models by Walder and Hallet (1985) and Rempel et al. (2016). Both models show near surface frost weathering at lower altitudes, which should results in lower UCS. The models show significantly higher frost cracking at higher altitudes with peaks at rock depths between 0.5 and 2 m suggesting a higher fracture spacing.</p><p>(iv) Rockwalls between 2,500 and 2,900 m were equipped with crackmeters and show higher daily temperature changes and crack deformation at lower altitudes or south facing aspects due to higher insolation compared to higher located rockwalls. Seasonal crack displacement depends on dipping of monitored blocks and is controlled by both thermal and cryogenic processes (Draebing, 2020).</p><p>(v) In summary, low-altitudinal rockwalls show a higher weathering at the surface due to a combination of thermal processes and near surface frost weathering resulting in release of small blocks and lower erosion rates. In contrast, rockwalls at higher altitudes reveal higher seasonal thermal changes propagating deeper into the rock in combination with frost cracking in higher depths, which results in larger blocks and higher erosion rates.</p><p> </p><p>Draebing, D.: Identification of rock and fracture kinematics in high Alpine rockwalls under the influence of altitude, Earth Surf. Dynam. Discuss., 1-31, 2020.</p><p>Rempel, A. W., Marshall, J. A., & Roering, J. J.: Modeling relative frost weathering rates at geomorphic scales. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 453, 87-95, 2016.</p><p>Walder, J., and Hallet, B.: A Theoretical-model of the fracture of rock during freezing, Geological Society of America Bulletin, 96, 336-346, 1985.</p>

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.