Too much nephrology? The CKD epidemic is real and concerning. A CON view.

Abstract

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) clearly depends on its definition, and the definition used most often is the one proposed by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines in 2012: 'CKD is defined as abnormalities of kidney structure or function, present for >3 months, with implications for health.' Abnormality of kidney function is a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min/1.73m2, and the most frequently used marker of kidney damage is the presence of albuminuria [albumin excretion rate >30 mg/24 h or albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) >30 mg/g (or 3 mg/mmol)]. However, two major aspects of this definition could explain why CKD prevalence is, in our view, overstated in most epidemiological studies. First, the fixed threshold at 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 is questionable because normal GFR decreases with age. This and the profound consequence it has on CKD epidemiology will be illustrated. The second aspect of the definition is the criterion of chronicity, which is ignored by the vast majority of epidemiological studies. In other words, confirming CKD (low GFR and/or high ACR) is mandatory. Indeed, a large proportion of subjects with a low first GFR level has a normal GFR level when tested a second time. The prevalence of CKD may hence, in fact, be considerably lower although still neither negligible nor irrelevant.