Abstract
This paper studies how a pre-bid minority ownership (toehold) in the target firm can improve the acquirer’s position in the takeover process by reducing the information asymmetry. Using a dynamic real options approach to compare the takeover options (with and without a toehold), the bidder can optimally choose the acquisition mode and the toehold size. Toehold acquisitions are more likely to occur under low market uncertainty, low expected synergies and high synergies uncertainty. These results suggest that managers’ overconfidence, market and synergies uncertainty, and asymmetry of information can help explaining the choice of toeholds when defining the acquisition strategy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
