Abstract

If rural-urban relationship is treated as an open and unregulated process, cities serve as a sink for rural population, meaning that higher proportions of rural people migrate from rural areas to stay permanently in the cities. This process, which is commonly referred to as rural urban migration can be more evident if the urban system is maintained as an open system. This holds key to interpreting how cities attract and retain their populations, a process that is critical to understand the causes of deterioration of most cities in developing countries that still draw much of their population inputs from rural areas, as it is the case with Africa. Deducing from South African experience, if policies that regulate movement of people between rural areas and cities are politically inclined they tend to give a particular character to the evolution and development of cities. This has been found to be true for two sets of policies implemented inSouth Africa. Ones that were implemented during Apartheid, while they encouraged the migration of unskilled laborers from rural to urban areas, failed to promote settlement and adaptation of African communities in the cities and this led to an upsurge of informal settlements around many cities ofSouth Africa. One that have been implemented since the advent of Democracy, due to their relaxed nature have led to an influx of people of African descent into the city centers and the effect of this has been the deterioration of these areas. With these findings this study cautions that urban system needs to be treated as open, that is, be allowed to regulate itself through economic success and failures of people who aspire to live in urban areas by choosing to settle in the cities.

Highlights

  • Economic disparities are a main differentiator between rural and urban areas [1,2]

  • Ones that were implemented during Apartheid, while they encouraged the migration of unskilled laborers from rural to urban areas, failed to promote settlement and adaptation of African communities in the cities and this led to an upsurge of informal settlements around many cities of South Africa

  • One that have been implemented since the advent of Democracy, due to their relaxed nature have led to an influx of people of African descent into the city centers and the effect of this has been the deterioration of these areas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Economic disparities are a main differentiator between rural and urban areas [1,2]. On determining the extent of relationship between urban and rural areas, economic disparities are a cause for people to migrate from rural to urban areas. This takes place in the form of people migrating from less economically active (rural) areas to more economically active urban areas [2] While this seems to represent a natural search for population equilibrium between rural and urban areas, migration of people from rural to urban areas widens the economic gap between the two areas [3]. For rural areas it entails the departure of resourceful, skilled and educated people [4]. For urban areas it entails an increase in the population densities and the subsequent demand for resources and the emergence of complex systems. These influences of rural areas on urban areas have direct impacts on urban areas, which expresses itself in the form of urban decay, environmental degradation, overpopulation and the development of anti-social behaviours such as crime [3]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call