Abstract
ABSTRACTThis essay reconsiders Biographia Literaria’s footnote on “mak[ing] a bull” through Coleridge’s treatment of the problem of nominalism. Coleridge critiques nominalism as a philosophical, political, and aesthetic problem of disunity exemplified in the work of John Locke. Yet a series of passages linked to the (false) unity of the bull, which “consists in the bringing together two incompatible thoughts, with the sensation, but without the sense, of their connection,” suggests that Coleridge also worries about the contrary problem of undesired poetic and social unities. Even as the bull’s feeling of connection makes it troublingly analogous to the imagination, I argue, the form of the bull also implies a model of critical reading that decomposes false connections. Such a process of reading a bull, the implications of which become most clear when read alongside the work of Theodor Adorno, entails a negative dialectics that stages the dialectical inversion of the imagination’s own synthesizing power. Recurring in passages that dramatize the Biographia’s persistent anxieties regarding mass print production and the commodification of poetry, the form of the bull thus suggests a desynonymizing materialist dialectic that departs from the increasingly conservative implications of Coleridge’s idealism.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.