To explore the efficiency of neuroendoscopy combined with Endport for hypertension intracerebral hemorrhage

Abstract

Objective To explore the value of neuroendoscopy combined with Endport for the surgery of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 92 cases of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in our department from January 2016 to February 2018. According to the different surgical methods, they were divided into small bone window group and neuroendoscopic group, 47 cases in small bone window group and 45 cases in neuroendoscope group.The amount of intraoperative bleeding, operative time, postoperative hematoma clearance, postoperative rebleeding, hospitalization time, postoperative complications and Glasgow prognosis expansion score (GOS-E) were recorded for statistical analysis. Results Compared with neuroendoscopy group, small bone window group had more bleeding loss [(182.6±34.5)ml vs (103.3±25.7)ml] and longer operation time [(168.7±26.3)min vs (115.7±18.7)min], with significant statistically difference (P 0.05); Postoperative rebleeding occured in 3 cases (6.4%) in small bone window group and 2 cases (4.4%) in the neuroendoscopic group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with neuroendoscopy group, small bone window group had longer hospitalization time [(18.5±4.3)days vs (13.5±3.8)days], higher tracheotomy rate [15(31.9%) vs 8(17.8%) ], with significant statistically difference (P 4 in small bone window group 2 months after operation was less than that in neuroendoscopy group [42.6%(20/47) vs 62.2%(28/45)], with significant statistically difference (P<0.05). Conclusions Endoscopic treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage has the advantages of minimally invasive, short operation time, less intraoperative hemorrhage, low incidence of complications and fast recovery of postoperative function. Key words: Intracranial hemorrhage, hypertensive/SU; Neuroendoscopy