Abstract
In the 2016 US presidential election campaign, an online news story broke reporting that ‘tens of thousands’ of pre-marked ballots had been found in a warehouse in Ohio. The ballots were reportedly marked in favor of Hillary Clinton and were to be counted alongside real election ballot boxes. The story contained a picture of the ballot boxes along with the individual who supposedly discovered the ballots. The story was false; however, before its falseness was exposed, it went viral and was viewed by the media as having affected the outcome of the election in favour of Donald Trump. While the deceit of the creator of this fake news should be of great concern, the perilousness of fake news to the corrosion of democracy is substantial. In this paper, I explore what it means to be an online news consumer in relation to the magnitude of the problem of fake news. I examine what it means for online news consumers to acquire knowledge and the pitfalls they experience in a fake news online environment. I add another layer of analysis through the exploration of how online news consumers determine truth and discuss the boundaries of determining the truth in fake news online environments. I conclude that in a fake news online environment, acquiring knowledge for democratic participation is dubious. Determining the truth of fake news stories can be uncertain, and when combined with limited opportunities to gain knowledge, online news consumers are in a conundrum of what to believe. I conclude with the suggestion that one-way education ought to assist online news consumers in understanding the limits of their epistemological stances in relation to fake news in online environments as an outset to assist citizens to become better online news consumers, so they have the option to enact democracy through increased epistemic volition.
Highlights
In early fall, in 2016, during the US presidential election campaign, Donald Trump, who was reportedly behind in the election polls, publically announced to a Columbus Ohio crowd that he was concerned with the probity of the election process declaring, ‘I’m afraid the election is going to be rigged, I have to be honest’ (Shane 2017)
Cameron Harris admitted to fabricating the story and photoshopping the photograph, which resulted in a fake news story that undermined, as I shall describe it in this paper, online news consumers’ ability to gain knowledge and detect the truth
I do so as for news consumers to gain knowledge would require them to extend beyond the scope of the online environment to verify whether or not the propositions within the fake news story are true by seeking physical evidence
Summary
In 2016, during the US presidential election campaign, Donald Trump, who was reportedly behind in the election polls, publically announced to a Columbus Ohio crowd that he was concerned with the probity of the election process declaring, ‘I’m afraid the election is going to be rigged, I have to be honest’ (Shane 2017). As we know, these online news consumers did not know or, as I suggest, did not possess the knowledge of the story, though they possessed justification and strong evidence which enabled them to infer the truth to support their belief.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
