Abstract
Academy of Management ReviewVol. 39, No. 3 DialogueTitles Matter: Addressing the Normalization of OtheringClaartje J. VinkenburgClaartje J. VinkenburgVU University AmsterdamPublished Online:6 Sep 2014https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0527AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsDownload CitationsAdd to favoritesTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail View articleREFERENCESAmoroso L. M., Loyd D. L., Hoobler J. M. 2010. The diversity education dilemma: Exposing status hierarchies without reinforcing them. Journal of Management Education, 34: 795–822. Google ScholarAshforth B. E., Mael F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14: 20–39.Link , Google ScholarBerger J., Cohen B. P., Zelditch M. 1972. Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37: 241–255. Google ScholarDevine P. G., Plant E. A., Harrison K. 1999. The problem of “us” versus “them” and AIDS stigma. American Behavioral Scientist, 42: 1212–1228. Google ScholarDovidio J. F., Gaertner S. L., Saguy T. 2009. Commonality and the complexity of “we”: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13: 3–20. Google ScholarFitzsimmons S. R. 2013. Multicultural employees: A framework for understanding how they contribute to organizations. Academy of Management Review, 38: 525–549.Link , Google ScholarGunew S. 1997. Postcolonialism and multiculturalism: Between race and ethnicity. Yearbook of English Edition Studies, 27: 22–39. Google ScholarHaggan M. 2004. Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: Dimensions of attraction. Journal of Pragmatics, 36: 293–317. Google ScholarHays J. C. 2010. Eight recommendations for writing titles of scientific manuscripts. Public Health Nursing, 27: 101–103. Google ScholarHogg M. A., Terry D. J. 2000. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25: 121–140.Link , Google ScholarJensen S. Q. 2011. Othering, identity formation and agency. Qualitative Studies, 2: 63–78. Google ScholarKiesling S. 2006. Identity in sociocultural anthropology and language. In Brown K. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.): 495–502. Oxford: Elsevier. Google ScholarLink B. G., Phelan J. C. 2001. Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 363–385. Google ScholarPlaut V. C. 2010. Diversity science: Why and how difference makes a difference. Psychological Inquiry, 21: 77–99. Google ScholarRobles J. S. 2013. Culture in conversation. In Kurylo A. (Ed.), Inter/cultural communication: Representation and construction of culture: 89–114. London: Sage. Google ScholarStrawson P. F. 1964. Identifying reference and truth-values. Theoria, 30: 96–118. Google ScholarTraustadóttir R. 2001. Research with others: Reflections on representation, difference and othering. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 3(2): 9–28. Google Scholarvan Oudenhoven J. P., Ward C. 2013. Fading majority cultures: The implications of transnationalism and demographic changes for immigrant acculturation. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 23: 81–97. Google ScholarVerkuyten M., Thijs J. 2010. Ethnic minority labeling, multiculturalism, and the attitude of majority group members. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29: 467–477. Google ScholarVertovec S. 2007. Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30: 1024–1054. Google ScholarWeston K. 1997. The virtual anthropologist. In Gupta A.Ferguson J. (Eds.), Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science: 163–184. Los Angeles: University of California Press. Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByUs, Them, and Others in Management ResearchStacey R. Fitzsimmons6 September 2014 | Academy of Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 3 Vol. 39, No. 3 Permissions Metrics in the past 12 months History Published online 6 September 2014 Published in print 1 July 2014 Information© Academy of Management ReviewI thank Brian Doornenbal, Channah Herschberg, Carolin Ossenkop, and Caroline Straub (2013 Paper Development Circle) for their feedback and help in structuring and clarifying my line of argumentation.PDF download
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
