Abstract

chromatographic behaviour of the glycopeptide components produced by the two cell types is similar on Ultrogel AcA-202 (shape of peak U2). Comparison of the incorporated radioactivities and the elution properties of the peaks from the conconavalin ASepharose and from the DEAE-trisacryl columns suggests that the differences between the glycopeptides obtained from the treated and the non-treated cells are quantitative but nonqualitative. More detailed analytical investigations are, however, necessary to evaluate eventual structural changes in the sugar moieties of the separated glycopeptides. Eye-derived growth factor seems to stimulate hyaluronic acid formation, as do the platelet and lymphocyte growth factors (Castor et al., 1977). In contrast with malignant transformation, eye-derived growth factor does not induce an increase in the highmolecular-weight glycopeptide population (Glick et al., 1973) and in chondroitin sulphate formation (Sampaio et al., 1977: Moczar et al., 198 1). The decrease of the cellular adhesivness consequent on treatment with the growth factor (Y. Courtois & J. Tassin, unpublished work) can be correlated to the diminished production of the sugar chains of the glycoproteins (fibronectin and cell-surface lectins) (Hughes, 1979) and to the increased heparan sulphate/hyaluronic acid ratio in the treated cells (Rollins & Culp, 1979).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.