Abstract

TiO2 nanolubricant has been used in this experimental work to study the performance of domestic air conditioner. Air conditioner capacity was 1 ton and the original system has R22 refrigerant. Three alternate refrigerant blends-Blend 1 (B1) composed of R32 and R22 (75:25 wt%), Blend 2 (B2) composed of R32 and R600a (75:25 wt%) and R32 refrigerant have been used in this experimental work to compare the thermo-physical performance with R22.0.01% and 0.02% volume concentration TiO2 nanolubricant have been used. All the temperatures and pressures of different section have been recorded using K-type thermocouple and pressure gauge respectively. Results showed that the selected blends with nanolubricant have higher COP compared to R22. Numerically, COP has been increased by about 25%–60% for B1 and B2 with nanolubricant and 20%–30% for R32 with nanolubricant compared to R22. R32 has shown maximum response by increasing about 60% of refrigerating effect compared to R22 while B1 and B2 have 45% more refrigerating effect. For compression work R32 with nanolubricant has similar compression work compared to R22 while B1 and B2 have 33% less compressor work required. Energy consumption has also been reduced for the blends with nanolubricant. B1 and B2 consumed 30% and 28% less power compared to R22 with nanolubricant. B1 and B2 with nanolubricant reduced the exergy loss by 40–70% while R32 reduced the exergy loss by 31% compared to R22. Overall, either B1 or B2 can also be used as an alternative of R22 with TiO2 nanolubricant.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call