Abstract

While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be viewed as simpler to manage then warfarin, they present their own unique management challenges resulting in frequent off-label dosing. It is unknown to what extent off-label dosing occurs when a patient is started on a DOAC versus later in their treatment. We aimed to characterize when off-label DOAC dosing is occurring and to evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention. We evaluated data from the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) registry, a retrospective quality improvement process using data abstractors, from 2018 - 2022 on the number of "alerts" that are generated in response to dosing deviating from evidence-based guidelines. Among a sample of 1,261 to 1,563 annual DOAC-treated patients in the MAQI2 registry, off-label dosing was relatively common. Over the 5-year period from 2018 through 2022, there were 735 total dosing alerts. Alerts occurred more frequently during a follow-up than at the time of initial prescribing, 69.0% (507) versus 31.0% (228) respectively. After initial review by quality improvement abstractors, 18.2% of alerts (134) resulted in contact to the prescriber. When the prescriber was contacted, it led to an intervention 74.6% of the time. The most common intervention was a change in DOAC dosing. This study demonstrates the benefit of DOAC prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention to monitor for off-label dosing for the entirety of the time period a patient is prescribed DOAC as deviations in evidence-based prescribing occur frequently during the follow-up period.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call