Abstract

The first time-of-flight positron emission tomography (TOF-PET) scanners were developed as early as in the 1980s. However, the poor light output and low detection efficiency of TOF-capable detectors available at the time limited any gain in image quality achieved with these TOF-PET scanners over the traditional non-TOF PET scanners. The discovery of LSO and other Lu-based scintillators revived interest in TOF-PET and led to the development of a second generation of scanners with high sensitivity and spatial resolution in the mid-2000s. The introduction of the silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) has recently yielded a third generation of TOF-PET systems with unprecedented imaging performance. Parallel to these instrumentation developments, much progress has been made in the development of image reconstruction algorithms that better utilize the additional information provided by TOF. Overall, the benefits range from a reduction in image variance (SNR increase), through allowing joint estimation of activity and attenuation, to better reconstructing data from limited angle systems. In this work, we review these developments, focusing on three broad areas: 1) timing theory and factors affecting the time resolution of a TOF-PET system; 2) utilization of TOF information for improved image reconstruction; and 3) quantification of the benefits of TOF compared to non-TOF PET. Finally, we offer a brief outlook on the TOF-PET developments anticipated in the short and longer term. Throughout this work, we aim to maintain a clinically driven perspective, treating TOF as one of multiple (and sometimes competitive) factors that can aid in the optimization of PET imaging performance.

Highlights

  • E VER since the reintroduction of time-of-flight positron emission tomography (TOF-PET) in the mid-2000s there has been a surge in activity related to hardware and computational developments that aim to further improve device performance and utilize the precise timing information for improvements in image quality and clinical practice

  • The development of silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) has led to the widespread commercial introduction of SiPM-based whole-body TOFPET systems from all major manufacturers [22]–[26]. These new scanners achieve TOF resolutions varying from 214 ps FWHM [24] to 382 ps FWHM [27] depending, among others, on the properties of the crystals and SiPMs used, the degree of light sharing, and percentage of crystal area covered by the SiPM array

  • These systems were based on cesium fluoride (CsF) or barium fluoride (BaF2) scintillators and achieved TOF resolutions in the range of 450–750 ps FWHM

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

E VER since the reintroduction of time-of-flight positron emission tomography (TOF-PET) in the mid-2000s there has been a surge in activity related to hardware and computational developments that aim to further improve device performance and utilize the precise timing information for improvements in image quality and clinical practice. This article provides a general review of TOF-PET, aiming to provide our perspective on the past, present, and future of the field. It does not aim to cover the full spectrum of work in this area, for which several other review articles have been published

Rationale and Principle of TOF in PET
History of TOF-PET
TIME RESOLUTION
Timing Theory
TOF-PET Scintillators
TOF-PET Photosensors
Optimization of Scintillation Detector Design
TOF-PET Reconstruction Basics
Advanced Reconstruction Methods Enabled by TOF
QUANTIFICATION OF TOF BENEFIT
Impact on Clinical Tasks
TOF Versus Other Basic Performance Parameters
Outlook on TOF-PET Scintillation Detectors
Outlook on TOF Reconstruction
Improving Time Resolution
TOF Versus Total-Body Coverage
Findings
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.