Abstract
Key points Disruptions in circadian rhythms across an organism are associated with negative health outcomes, such as cardiometabolic and neurodegenerative diseases.Exercise has been proposed as a time cue for the circadian clock in rodents and humans.In this study, we assessed the effect of a single bout of endurance exercise on the skeletal muscle clock in vivo and a bout of muscle contractions in vitro.Timing of exercise or contractions influences the directional response of the muscle clock phase in vivo and in vitro.Our findings demonstrate that muscle contractions, as a component of exercise, can directly modulate the expression of muscle clock components in a time‐of‐day dependent manner. Exercise has been proposed to be a zeitgeber for the muscle circadian clock mechanism. However, this is not well defined and it is unknown if exercise timing induces directional shifts of the muscle clock. Our purpose herein was to assess the effect of one bout of treadmill exercise on skeletal muscle clock phase changes. We subjected PERIOD2::LUCIFERASE mice (n = 30F) to one 60 min treadmill exercise bout at three times of day. Exercise at ZT5, 5 h after lights on, induced a phase advance (100.2 ± 25.8 min; P = 0.0002), whereas exercise at ZT11, 1 h before lights off, induced a phase delay (62.1 ± 21.1 min; P = 0.0003). Exercise at ZT17, middle of the dark phase, did not alter the muscle clock phase. Exercise induces diverse systemic changes so we developed an in vitro model system to examine the effects of contractile activity on muscle clock phase. Contractions applied at peak or trough Bmal1 expression induced significant phase delays (applied at peak: 27.2 ± 10.2 min; P = 0.0017; applied at trough: 64.6 ± 6.5 min, P < 0.0001). Contractions applied during the transition from peak to trough Bmal1 expression induced a phase advance (49.8 ± 23.1 min; P = 0.0051). Lastly, contractions at different times of day resulted in differential changes of core clock gene expression, demonstrating an exercise and clock interaction, providing insight into potential mechanisms of exercise‐induced phase shifts. These data demonstrate that muscle contractions, as part of exercise, are sufficient to shift the muscle circadian clock phase, likely through changes in core clock gene expression. Additionally, our findings that exercise induces directional muscle clock phase changes confirms that exercise is a bona fide environmental time cue for skeletal muscle.
Highlights
The circadian clock is an evolutionarily conserved regulatory mechanism that allows organisms to adapt, respond, and entrain to their environment
Previous data from our group found that four weeks of daily treadmill running in the rest/light phase resulted in significant shifts of the skeletal muscle clock, with no shift in the central clock in the SCN (Wolff and Esser, 2012)
We found that exercise at either ZT5 or ZT11 resulted in significant changes in the phase of bioluminescence that this change in phase was maintained over the full course of the experiment (Figure 2A)
Summary
The circadian clock is an evolutionarily conserved regulatory mechanism that allows organisms to adapt, respond, and entrain to their environment. By integrating/responding to environmental signals (i.e., time cues), the circadian clock coordinates daily oscillations of behaviour, metabolism, and gene expression at the organismal and tissue-specific levels driving circadian rhythms (Golombek and Rosenstein, 2010). The most prominent example is the central clock in the brain (SCN) where the circadian phase of a rest/activity pattern is determined by the naturally occurring light/dark cycle (fixed event) driving most circadian behaviour (Merrow et al, 2005; Wright et al, 2013). Environmental time cues that are capable of entrainment (i.e., setting circadian phase) are called Zeitgebers and while light is the most prominent time cue, it primarily entrains the SCN central clock. Nonphotic time cues can act on peripheral tissues, influencing the phase of peripheral tissue clocks with the potential for putting them out of alignment with the phase set by the SCN (Koronowski et al, 2019; Maywood and Mrosovsky, 2001; van der Vinne et al, 2018; Wolff and Esser, 2012)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.