Abstract

Given that complexity is critical for psychological processing, it is somewhat surprising that the field was dominated for a long time by probabilistic methods that focus on the quantitative aspects of the source/output. Although the more recent approaches based on the Minimum Description Length principle have produced interesting and useful models of psychological complexity, they have not directly defined the meaning and quantitative unit of complexity measurement. Contrasted to these mathematical approaches are various ad hoc measures based on different aspects of structure, which can work well but suffer from the same problem. The present manuscript is composed of two self-sufficient, yet related sections. In Section 1, we describe a complexity measure for binary strings which satisfies both these conditions (Aksentijevic–Gibson complexity; AG). We test the measure on a number of classic studies employing both short and long strings and draw attention to an important feature—a complexity profile—that could be of interest in modelling the psychological processing of structure as well as analysis of strings of any length. In Section 2 we discuss different factors affecting the complexity of visual form and showcase a 2D generalization of AG complexity. In addition, we provide algorithms in R that compute the AG complexity for binary strings and matrices and demonstrate their effectiveness on examples involving complexity judgments, symmetry perception, perceptual grouping, entropy, and elementary cellular automata. Finally, we enclose a repository of codes, data and stimuli for our example in order to facilitate experimentation and application of the measure in sciences outside psychology.

Highlights

  • Given that complexity is critical for psychological processing, it is somewhat surprising that the field was dominated for a long time by probabilistic methods that focus on the quantitative aspects of the source/output

  • This paper has three aims: to describe the motivation for a universal complexity measure based on psychological principles (Aksentijevic–Gibson complexity; AG) that has recently been shown to be applicable to the analysis of physical data [1] and showcase its performance on a broad palette of psychological phenomena; to introduce an implementation of the measure in R which allows for easy computation of complexities and complexity profiles of binary strings and 2D arrays; and to provide a reference stimulus/data repository that would facilitate exploration of psychological complexity for experts from different disciplines

  • Today, many decades complexity—they us today, many psychology decades later.from the very beginning, complexity took a Despite its tacit inspire presence in scientific

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Given that complexity is critical for psychological processing, it is somewhat surprising that the field was dominated for a long time by probabilistic methods that focus on the quantitative aspects of the source/output. Length principle have produced interesting and useful models of psychological complexity, they have not directly defined the meaning and quantitative unit of complexity measurement Contrasted to these mathematical approaches are various ad hoc measures based on different aspects of structure, which can work well but suffer from the same problem. This paper has three aims: to describe the motivation for a universal complexity measure based on psychological principles (Aksentijevic–Gibson complexity; AG) that has recently been shown to be applicable to the analysis of physical data [1] and showcase its performance on a broad palette of psychological phenomena; to introduce an implementation of the measure in R which allows for easy computation of complexities and complexity profiles of binary strings and 2D arrays; and to provide a reference stimulus/data repository that would facilitate exploration of psychological complexity for experts from different disciplines. Today, many decades complexity—they us today, many psychology decades later.from the very beginning, complexity took a Despite its tacit inspire presence in scientific

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call